Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> The set of functions process_session, task_session, process_group
> and task_pgrp is confusing, as the names can be mixed with each other
> when looking at the code for a long time.
> 
> The proposals are to
> * equip the functions that return the integer with _nr suffix to
>   represent that fact,
> * and to make all functions work with task (not process) by making
>   the common prefix of the same name.
> 
> For monotony the routines signal_session() and set_signal_session()
> are replaced with task_session_nr() and set_task_session(), especially
> since they are only used with the explicit task->signal dereference.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>
> Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>

I think we all agreed on this one. Can you send it to lkml@ as a 
candidate for -mm ?

Thanks,

C. 
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers