Kirill Korotaev wrote:
>> the results were also very reproducible but the profiling was too noisy.
>> we also changed the kernel. the previous pidns patchset was on a 2.6.21-mm2 
>> and we ported it on a 2.6.22-rc1-mm1.
> 
> If reproducible, then were they the same as Pavel posted?
> 
>> but let me remove some debugging options,
> 
> sure.

for info, I just noticed that one of the host running the bench was 
using acpi as a clocksource and not tsc bc it was considered fuzzy. 

All my apologies.

C. 
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers