OpenVZ Forum


SUBFORUMS
  [PATCH] cgroup: prefer [kv]zalloc over [kv]malloc+memset in memory controll...
By: Jesper Juhl on Mon, 01 November 2010 19:40
  [PATCH] cgroup: prefer [kv]zalloc over [kv]malloc+memset in memory controll...
By: Jesper Juhl on Mon, 01 November 2010 19:35
  [PATCH] cgroup: Avoid a memset by using vzalloc
By: Jesper Juhl on Sat, 30 October 2010 21:35
  Re: [PATCH] cgroup: Avoid a memset by using vzalloc
By: Jesper Juhl on Mon, 01 November 2010 05:40
  Re: [PATCH v4 11/11] memcg: check memcg dirty limits in page writeback
By: Wu Fengguang on Sun, 31 October 2010 20:03
  Re: [PATCH v4 02/11] memcg: document cgroup dirty memory interfaces
By: Wu Fengguang on Sat, 30 October 2010 03:02
  Re: [PATCH 0/5][v5][cr] Checkpoint/restart file locks
By: Lin Ming on Fri, 29 October 2010 14:31
  Need help to debug container's freeze
By: pva on Fri, 29 October 2010 12:27
  Re: [PATCH v4 06/11] memcg: add dirty page accounting infrastructure
By: Wu Fengguang on Fri, 29 October 2010 11:13
  Re: [PATCH v4 02/11] memcg: document cgroup dirty memory interfaces
By: Wu Fengguang on Fri, 29 October 2010 11:03
  [PATCH] [openvz] printk: Handle global log buffer reallocation
By: maximilian attems on Tue, 19 October 2010 08:11
  [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same name...
By: Daniel Hokka Zakrisso on Thu, 17 July 2008 14:55
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same ...
By: Pavel Emelianov on Thu, 17 July 2008 15:01
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same ...
By: Daniel Hokka Zakrisso on Thu, 17 July 2008 15:24
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same ...
By: Pavel Emelianov on Thu, 17 July 2008 15:54
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same ...
By: Oleg Nesterov on Thu, 17 July 2008 17:31
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same ...
By: ebiederm on Thu, 17 July 2008 17:50
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same ...
By: ebiederm on Thu, 17 July 2008 17:45
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same ...
By: Daniel Hokka Zakrisso on Thu, 17 July 2008 18:39
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same ...
By: ebiederm on Thu, 17 July 2008 18:45
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same ...
By: Sukadev Bhattiprolu on Thu, 17 July 2008 18:13
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same ...
By: Daniel Hokka Zakrisso on Thu, 17 July 2008 18:44
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same ...
By: ebiederm on Thu, 17 July 2008 18:46
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same ...
By: Oleg Nesterov on Wed, 23 July 2008 14:33
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same ...
By: Daniel Hokka Zakrisso on Wed, 23 July 2008 16:09
  Roadmap for features planed for containers where and Some future features i...
By: Peter Dolding on Mon, 21 July 2008 11:03
  Re: Roadmap for features planed for containers where and Some future featur...
By: ebiederm on Mon, 21 July 2008 12:13
  Re: Roadmap for features planed for containers where and Some future featur...
By: Peter Dolding on Mon, 21 July 2008 13:21
  Re: Roadmap for features planed for containers where and Some future featur...
By: ebiederm on Tue, 22 July 2008 01:28
  Re: Roadmap for features planed for containers where and Some future featur...
By: Oren Laadan on Tue, 22 July 2008 14:05
  Re: Roadmap for features planed for containers where and Some future featur...
By: Peter Dolding on Wed, 23 July 2008 00:56
  [PATCH -mm 3/3] i/o accounting and control
By: Andrea Righi on Tue, 22 July 2008 20:58
  [PATCH -mm 2/3] i/o bandwidth controller infrastructure
By: Andrea Righi on Tue, 22 July 2008 20:58
  [PATCH -mm 1/3] i/o bandwidth controller documentation
By: Andrea Righi on Tue, 22 July 2008 20:58
  [PATCH -mm 0/3] cgroup: block device i/o bandwidth controller (v7)
By: Andrea Righi on Tue, 22 July 2008 20:58
  [RFC][PATCH 0/4[ memcg shrinking usage.
By: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki on Fri, 18 July 2008 10:31
  [RFC][PATCH 3/4] memcg shrink usage at limit change
By: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki on Fri, 18 July 2008 10:36
  [RFC][PATCH 1/4] res_counter set_limit and -EBUSY.
By: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki on Fri, 18 July 2008 10:34
  Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/4] res_counter set_limit and -EBUSY.
By: Pavel Emelianov on Mon, 21 July 2008 17:32
  [RFC][PATCH 2/4] res_counter check usage under val
By: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki on Fri, 18 July 2008 10:35
  Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] res_counter check usage under val
By: Pavel Emelianov on Mon, 21 July 2008 17:41
  [RFC][PATCH 4/4] memcg shrinking usage
By: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki on Fri, 18 July 2008 10:37
  HASH FS
By: Jun OKAJIMA on Mon, 21 July 2008 14:49
  Re: [patch 1/1] [TCP] fix kernel panic with listening_get_next
By: davem on Sat, 19 July 2008 07:16
  [PATCH 10/15] sysfs: Merge sysfs_rename_dir and sysfs_move_dir
By: ebiederm on Fri, 04 July 2008 01:17
  [PATCH 11/15] sysfs: Implement sysfs_delete_link and sysfs_rename_link
By: ebiederm on Fri, 04 July 2008 01:18
  [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for device cl...
By: ebiederm on Fri, 04 July 2008 01:20
  Re: [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for devic...
By: Tejun Heo on Fri, 04 July 2008 07:50
  Re: [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for devic...
By: ebiederm on Fri, 04 July 2008 13:31
  Re: [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for devic...
By: Tejun Heo on Fri, 04 July 2008 13:57
  Re: [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for devic...
By: gregkh on Fri, 04 July 2008 16:12
  Re: [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for devic...
By: ebiederm on Fri, 04 July 2008 21:49
  Re: [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for devic...
By: ebiederm on Mon, 14 July 2008 01:54
  Re: [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for devic...
By: Tejun Heo on Wed, 16 July 2008 03:25
  Re: [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for devic...
By: ebiederm on Wed, 16 July 2008 05:41
  Re: [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for devic...
By: Tejun Heo on Wed, 16 July 2008 05:50
  Re: [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for devic...
By: ebiederm on Wed, 16 July 2008 06:32
  Re: [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for devic...
By: Tejun Heo on Wed, 16 July 2008 06:48
  Re: [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for devic...
By: Tejun Heo on Wed, 16 July 2008 07:02
  <more>
  Re: [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for devic...
By: ebiederm on Wed, 16 July 2008 21:09
  Re: [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for devic...
By: gregkh on Thu, 17 July 2008 23:08
  Re: [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for devic...
By: Tejun Heo on Fri, 18 July 2008 12:41
  Re: [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for devic...
By: gregkh on Fri, 18 July 2008 18:49
  Re: [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for devic...
By: ebiederm on Fri, 18 July 2008 20:19
  Re: [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for devic...
By: Tejun Heo on Sat, 19 July 2008 01:07
  Re: [PATCH 12/15] driver core: Implement tagged directory support for devic...
By: ebiederm on Fri, 04 July 2008 22:00
  [ccr@linuxsymposium.org: LS Mini Summit Update (18/07/08)]
By: serue on Fri, 18 July 2008 18:19
  Re: [ccr@linuxsymposium.org: LS Mini Summit Update (18/07/08)]
By: Paul Menage on Fri, 18 July 2008 18:48
  Checkpoint/Restart mini-summit agenda
By: Daniel Lezcano on Fri, 18 July 2008 09:19
  [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend -v2 - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Nadia Derbey on Tue, 08 July 2008 11:24
  [RFC PATCH 4/5] use next syscall data to change the behavior of IPC_SET
By: Nadia Derbey on Tue, 08 July 2008 11:24
  Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] use next syscall data to change the behavior of IPC_SET
By: serue on Tue, 08 July 2008 19:56
  [RFC PATCH 2/5] use next syscall data to predefine ipc objects ids
By: Nadia Derbey on Tue, 08 July 2008 11:24
  Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] use next syscall data to predefine ipc objects ids
By: serue on Tue, 08 July 2008 19:38
  [RFC PATCH 1/5] adds the procfs facilities
By: Nadia Derbey on Tue, 08 July 2008 11:24
  Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] adds the procfs facilities
By: serue on Tue, 08 July 2008 19:32
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend -v2 - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Alexey Dobriyan on Wed, 09 July 2008 22:10
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend -v2 - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: ebiederm on Thu, 10 July 2008 00:43
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend -v2 - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Alexey Dobriyan on Thu, 10 July 2008 01:39
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend -v2 - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: ebiederm on Thu, 10 July 2008 02:14
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend -v2 - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: ebiederm on Tue, 15 July 2008 18:18
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend -v2 - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Oren Laadan on Thu, 17 July 2008 22:42
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend -v2 - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Matt Helsley on Fri, 18 July 2008 01:09
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend -v2 - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: ebiederm on Fri, 18 July 2008 02:49
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend -v2 - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: ebiederm on Fri, 18 July 2008 02:40
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend -v2 - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Dave Hansen on Thu, 10 July 2008 16:01
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend -v2 - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: ebiederm on Thu, 10 July 2008 00:36
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend -v2 - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Nadia Derbey on Thu, 10 July 2008 09:54
  [BUG][cryo] Create file on restart ?
By: Sukadev Bhattiprolu on Wed, 16 July 2008 18:50
  Re: [BUG][cryo] Create file on restart ?
By: serue on Wed, 16 July 2008 19:26
  Re: [BUG][cryo] Create file on restart ?
By: Sukadev Bhattiprolu on Wed, 16 July 2008 20:45
  Re: [BUG][cryo] Create file on restart ?
By: serue on Wed, 16 July 2008 20:57
  Re: [BUG][cryo] Create file on restart ?
By: Sukadev Bhattiprolu on Wed, 16 July 2008 21:26
  Re: [BUG][cryo] Create file on restart ?
By: Matt Helsley on Wed, 16 July 2008 22:31
  Re: [BUG][cryo] Create file on restart ?
By: Sukadev Bhattiprolu on Wed, 16 July 2008 23:20
  Re: [BUG][cryo] Create file on restart ?
By: serue on Thu, 17 July 2008 02:21
  Re: [BUG][cryo] Create file on restart ?
By: Oren Laadan on Thu, 17 July 2008 23:35
  Re: [BUG][cryo] Create file on restart ?
By: serue on Thu, 17 July 2008 02:18
  Re: [BUG][cryo] Create file on restart ?
By: Oren Laadan on Thu, 17 July 2008 23:22
  Re: [BUG][cryo] Create file on restart ?
By: Matt Helsley on Wed, 16 July 2008 20:59
  [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a specified id
By: Nadia Derbey on Fri, 18 April 2008 05:44
  [PATCH 4/4] - v2 - PID: use the target ID specified in procfs
By: Nadia Derbey on Fri, 18 April 2008 05:45
  Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a specified id
By: Dave Hansen on Fri, 18 April 2008 17:07
  Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a specified id
By: Nadia Derbey on Mon, 21 April 2008 11:32
  Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a speci...
By: Alexey Dobriyan on Tue, 22 April 2008 18:44
  Re: Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a s...
By: Dave Hansen on Tue, 22 April 2008 18:56
  Re: Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a s...
By: serue on Tue, 22 April 2008 19:51
  Re: Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a s...
By: Alexey Dobriyan on Tue, 22 April 2008 20:09
  Re: Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a s...
By: Dave Hansen on Tue, 22 April 2008 22:56
  Re: Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a s...
By: Kirill Korotaev on Wed, 23 April 2008 06:40
  Re: Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a s...
By: Dave Hansen on Wed, 23 April 2008 15:33
  Re: Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a s...
By: Kirill Korotaev on Thu, 24 April 2008 07:00
  Re: Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a s...
By: Dave Hansen on Thu, 24 April 2008 18:30
  Re: Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a s...
By: Oren Laadan on Thu, 24 April 2008 23:13
  Re: Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a s...
By: Oren Laadan on Thu, 24 April 2008 01:19
  Re: Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a s...
By: ebiederm on Thu, 10 July 2008 01:58
  Re: Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a s...
By: Dave Hansen on Thu, 10 July 2008 17:12
  Re: Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a s...
By: serue on Thu, 10 July 2008 17:32
  Re: Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a s...
By: ebiederm on Thu, 10 July 2008 18:55
  Re: Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a s...
By: Dave Hansen on Thu, 10 July 2008 19:06
  Re: Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a s...
By: ebiederm on Thu, 10 July 2008 19:21
  Re: Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a s...
By: Dave Hansen on Thu, 10 July 2008 19:47
  <more>
  <more>
  Re: Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a s...
By: Oren Laadan on Thu, 17 July 2008 23:16
  Re: Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a s...
By: Oren Laadan on Thu, 17 July 2008 23:14
  Re: Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a s...
By: Oren Laadan on Thu, 17 July 2008 23:09
  Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object creation with a specified id
By: Pavel Machek on Wed, 23 April 2008 14:23
  [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Nadia Derbey on Thu, 03 July 2008 14:40
  [RFC PATCH 2/5] use next syscall data to predefine ipc objects ids
By: Nadia Derbey on Thu, 03 July 2008 14:40
  Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] use next syscall data to predefine ipc objects ids
By: serue on Mon, 07 July 2008 18:35
  Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] use next syscall data to predefine ipc objects ids
By: Nadia Derbey on Tue, 08 July 2008 05:30
  [RFC PATCH 5/5] use next syscall data to predefine the file descriptor valu...
By: Nadia Derbey on Thu, 03 July 2008 14:40
  [RFC PATCH 4/5] use next syscall data to change the behavior of IPC_SET
By: Nadia Derbey on Thu, 03 July 2008 14:40
  [RFC PATCH 1/5] adds the procfs facilities
By: Nadia Derbey on Thu, 03 July 2008 14:40
  Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] adds the procfs facilities
By: serue on Mon, 07 July 2008 18:30
  Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] adds the procfs facilities
By: Nadia Derbey on Tue, 08 July 2008 05:25
  [RFC PATCH 3/5] use next syscall data to predefine process ids
By: Nadia Derbey on Thu, 03 July 2008 14:40
  Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] use next syscall data to predefine process ids
By: serue on Mon, 07 July 2008 18:54
  Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] use next syscall data to predefine process ids
By: Nadia Derbey on Tue, 08 July 2008 05:44
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Pavel Machek on Fri, 04 July 2008 10:27
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Nadia Derbey on Fri, 04 July 2008 12:07
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Pavel Machek on Tue, 08 July 2008 10:51
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: serue on Tue, 08 July 2008 21:47
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Pavel Machek on Tue, 08 July 2008 21:53
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Nadia Derbey on Thu, 10 July 2008 06:54
  Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Paul Menage on Thu, 10 July 2008 07:01
  Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Nadia Derbey on Thu, 10 July 2008 09:14
  Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Paul Menage on Thu, 10 July 2008 09:30
  Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Nadia Derbey on Thu, 10 July 2008 10:11
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Nadia Derbey on Thu, 10 July 2008 07:42
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Pavel Machek on Thu, 10 July 2008 08:54
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Nadia Derbey on Thu, 10 July 2008 09:29
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Dave Hansen on Thu, 10 July 2008 17:53
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Pavel Machek on Thu, 10 July 2008 18:45
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Dave Hansen on Thu, 10 July 2008 19:04
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: serue on Thu, 10 July 2008 19:27
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: serue on Mon, 07 July 2008 19:01
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Pavel Machek on Tue, 08 July 2008 10:52
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: serue on Tue, 08 July 2008 21:50
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Pavel Machek on Tue, 08 July 2008 21:58
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: serue on Wed, 09 July 2008 02:20
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Nadia Derbey on Thu, 10 July 2008 07:58
  Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Paul Menage on Thu, 10 July 2008 08:34
  Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Nadia Derbey on Thu, 10 July 2008 09:38
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
By: Oren Laadan on Thu, 17 July 2008 22:26
  [PATCH 1/1] signal: Introduce kill_pid_ns_info
By: Daniel Hokka Zakrisso on Thu, 17 July 2008 19:37
  Re: [PATCH 1/1] signal: Introduce kill_pid_ns_info
By: akpm on Thu, 17 July 2008 21:10
  [PATCH] signal: Introduce kill_pid_ns_info
By: Daniel Hokka Zakrisso on Thu, 17 July 2008 21:54
  [PATCH 2/2] signals: replace p->pid == 1 check with a check for task_chi...
By: Daniel Hokka Zakrisso on Thu, 17 July 2008 14:56
  Re: [PATCH 2/2] signals: replace p->pid == 1 check with a check for task...
By: ebiederm on Thu, 17 July 2008 17:55
  Re: [PATCH 2/2] signals: replace p->pid == 1 check with a check for task...
By: Daniel Hokka Zakrisso on Thu, 17 July 2008 18:21
  Re: [PATCH 2/2] signals: replace p->pid == 1 check with a check for task...
By: ebiederm on Thu, 17 July 2008 18:51
  Checkpoint/Restart mini-summit
By: Daniel Lezcano on Tue, 15 July 2008 10:49
  Re: Checkpoint/Restart mini-summit
By: ebiederm on Tue, 15 July 2008 18:44
  Re: Checkpoint/Restart mini-summit
By: serue on Wed, 16 July 2008 15:15
  Re: Checkpoint/Restart mini-summit
By: ebiederm on Wed, 16 July 2008 19:04
  Re: Checkpoint/Restart mini-summit
By: serue on Wed, 16 July 2008 19:35
  Re: Checkpoint/Restart mini-summit
By: ebiederm on Wed, 16 July 2008 21:27
  Re: Checkpoint/Restart mini-summit
By: serue on Thu, 17 July 2008 02:27
  Re: Checkpoint/Restart mini-summit
By: Daniel Lezcano on Thu, 17 July 2008 16:15
  Re: Checkpoint/Restart mini-summit
By: ebiederm on Tue, 15 July 2008 18:54
  Re: Checkpoint/Restart mini-summit
By: serue on Wed, 16 July 2008 15:17
  Re: Checkpoint/Restart mini-summit
By: Daniel Lezcano on Wed, 16 July 2008 15:26
  [PATCH][RFC] dirty balancing for cgroups
By: yamamoto on Wed, 09 July 2008 06:00
  Re: [PATCH][RFC] dirty balancing for cgroups
By: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki on Thu, 10 July 2008 23:50
  Re: [PATCH][RFC] dirty balancing for cgroups
By: yamamoto on Fri, 11 July 2008 04:06
  Re: [PATCH][RFC] dirty balancing for cgroups
By: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki on Fri, 11 July 2008 05:15
  Re: [PATCH][RFC] dirty balancing for cgroups
By: yamamoto on Fri, 11 July 2008 05:59
  Re: [PATCH][RFC] dirty balancing for cgroups
By: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki on Fri, 11 July 2008 07:09
  Re: [PATCH][RFC] dirty balancing for cgroups
By: yamamoto on Fri, 11 July 2008 08:34
  Re: [PATCH][RFC] dirty balancing for cgroups
By: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki on Fri, 11 July 2008 08:48
  Re: [PATCH][RFC] dirty balancing for cgroups
By: Peter Zijlstra on Mon, 14 July 2008 13:49
  Re: Re: [PATCH][RFC] dirty balancing for cgroups
By: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki on Mon, 14 July 2008 14:38
  Re: [PATCH][RFC] dirty balancing for cgroups
By: yamamoto on Thu, 17 July 2008 01:43
  Re: [PATCH][RFC] dirty balancing for cgroups
By: Peter Zijlstra on Mon, 14 July 2008 13:37
  [ccr@linuxsymposium.org: LS Mini Summit: Schedule Update & Info]
By: serue on Wed, 16 July 2008 19:18
  cryo and mm->arg_start
By: serue on Fri, 11 July 2008 13:13
  Re: cryo and mm->arg_start
By: Dave Hansen on Fri, 11 July 2008 16:38
  Re: cryo and mm->arg_start
By: serue on Fri, 11 July 2008 21:26
  Re: cryo and mm->arg_start
By: Matt Helsley on Fri, 11 July 2008 22:01
  Re: cryo and mm->arg_start
By: serue on Sun, 13 July 2008 21:08
  Re: cryo and mm->arg_start
By: Sukadev Bhattiprolu on Tue, 15 July 2008 21:40
  Re: cryo and mm->arg_start
By: serue on Wed, 16 July 2008 15:23
  [PATCH -mm 3/3] i/o accounting and control
By: Andrea Righi on Tue, 15 July 2008 20:40
  [PATCH -mm 2/3] i/o bandwidth controller infrastructure
By: Andrea Righi on Tue, 15 July 2008 20:40
  [PATCH -mm 1/3] i/o bandwidth controller documentation
By: Andrea Righi on Tue, 15 July 2008 20:40
  [PATCH -mm 0/3] cgroup: block device i/o bandwidth controller (v6)
By: Andrea Righi on Tue, 15 July 2008 20:40
  Feeding containers patches into linux-next
By: Dave Hansen on Tue, 15 July 2008 14:43
  Re: Feeding containers patches into linux-next
By: serue on Tue, 15 July 2008 15:29
  Re: Feeding containers patches into linux-next
By: ebiederm on Tue, 15 July 2008 17:50
  Re: Feeding containers patches into linux-next
By: Dave Hansen on Tue, 15 July 2008 17:55
  Re: Feeding containers patches into linux-next
By: ebiederm on Tue, 15 July 2008 18:56
  Re: Feeding containers patches into linux-next
By: Dave Hansen on Tue, 15 July 2008 19:07
  [PATCH -mm 2/3] i/o bandwidth controller infrastructure
By: Andrea Righi on Sat, 12 July 2008 11:31
  Re: [PATCH -mm 2/3] i/o bandwidth controller infrastructure
By: Li Zefan on Mon, 14 July 2008 02:25
  Re: [PATCH -mm 2/3] i/o bandwidth controller infrastructure
By: Andrea Righi on Mon, 14 July 2008 21:26
  [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: Paul Menage on Thu, 10 July 2008 06:46
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: Paul Jackson on Thu, 10 July 2008 11:23
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki on Fri, 11 July 2008 00:17
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: Daisuke Nishimura on Mon, 14 July 2008 06:28
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki on Mon, 14 July 2008 07:50
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: Daisuke Nishimura on Mon, 14 July 2008 12:36
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: Paul Menage on Mon, 14 July 2008 19:16
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: Li Zefan on Fri, 11 July 2008 02:14
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: Paul Menage on Fri, 11 July 2008 03:31
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: serue on Fri, 11 July 2008 14:27
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: Paul Menage on Fri, 11 July 2008 15:23
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: serue on Fri, 11 July 2008 15:34
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: Paul Menage on Fri, 11 July 2008 15:36
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: Balbir Singh on Fri, 11 July 2008 16:12
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: Paul Menage on Fri, 11 July 2008 20:41
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: Matt Helsley on Sat, 12 July 2008 00:03
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: Paul Menage on Sat, 12 July 2008 00:18
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: Matt Helsley on Sat, 12 July 2008 00:48
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: Paul Menage on Sat, 12 July 2008 01:49
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: Matt Helsley on Sat, 12 July 2008 02:03
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: Paul Menage on Sat, 12 July 2008 02:09
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: Peter Zijlstra on Mon, 14 July 2008 10:56
  Re: [RFC] Transactional CGroup task attachment
By: Peter Zijlstra on Mon, 14 July 2008 10:50
  Re: [PATCH] ltp controllers: block device i/o bandwidth controller testcase...
By: Subrata Modak on Mon, 07 July 2008 10:24
  Re: [PATCH] ltp controllers: block device i/o bandwidth controller testcase
By: Andrea Righi on Mon, 07 July 2008 13:43
  Re: [PATCH] ltp controllers: block device i/o bandwidth controller testcase
By: Subrata Modak on Mon, 14 July 2008 17:23
Goto Forum:
  
Legend New Messages New Messages   No New messages No New messages   Locked (w/ unread messages) Locked (w/ unread messages)   Locked Locked   Moved to another forum Moved to another forum

Current Time: Sun Aug 25 11:55:10 GMT 2019