OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » Re: LTP result output for container-init
Re: LTP result output for container-init [message #26185] Wed, 16 January 2008 16:54 Go to next message
Dave Hansen is currently offline  Dave Hansen
Messages: 240
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 20:57 +0530, Rishikesh K. Rajak wrote:
> These failures are conceding with 2.6.23-mm1 itself. Just wanted to
> know if someone is working on this still.
> 
>   fcntl11                        FAIL
>   fcntl14                        FAIL
>   fcntl17                        FAIL
>   fcntl19                        FAIL
>   fcntl20                        FAIL
>   fcntl21                        FAIL

Do you mean that these are happening with 2.6.23-mm1, even without any
lxc patches?

Have you reported these to LKML or to Andrew Morton?  If not, please do.
You can make sure to garner attention by putting something like,

	2.6.23-mm1 fcntl regressions

as the subject.  But, please do make sure they're regressions, and
pinpoint the versions where they occur.  You should also be prepared to
do a bisection of the patches in -mm to find it.

-- Dave

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
Re: LTP result output for container-init [message #26186 is a reply to message #26185] Wed, 16 January 2008 17:31 Go to previous message
Sukadev Bhattiprolu is currently offline  Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Messages: 413
Registered: August 2006
Senior Member
Dave Hansen [haveblue@us.ibm.com] wrote:
| On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 20:57 +0530, Rishikesh K. Rajak wrote:
| > These failures are conceding with 2.6.23-mm1 itself. Just wanted to
| > know if someone is working on this still.

I think Rishi is referring to these failures when running LTP in
a child pid namespace. That is a known problem. Its not a regression
but a pending task in pid namespace cleanup.

| > 
| >   fcntl11                        FAIL
| >   fcntl14                        FAIL
| >   fcntl17                        FAIL
| >   fcntl19                        FAIL
| >   fcntl20                        FAIL
| >   fcntl21                        FAIL
| 
| Do you mean that these are happening with 2.6.23-mm1, even without any
| lxc patches?
| 
| Have you reported these to LKML or to Andrew Morton?  If not, please do.
| You can make sure to garner attention by putting something like,
| 
| 	2.6.23-mm1 fcntl regressions
| 
| as the subject.  But, please do make sure they're regressions, and
| pinpoint the versions where they occur.  You should also be prepared to
| do a bisection of the patches in -mm to find it.
| 
| -- Dave
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
Previous Topic: OLS2008 "namespaces status update" report
Next Topic: LTP Result on 2.6.24-rc6, some highlights on container result
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Jun 15 11:55:17 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03729 seconds