OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure [message #20020] Mon, 10 September 2007 17:05 Go to next message
Jan Engelhardt is currently offline  Jan Engelhardt
Messages: 18
Registered: August 2006
Junior Member
On Sep 10 2007 22:40, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
>+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
>+SUBSYS(cpuctlr)
>+#endif

cpuctl, cpuctrl, cpu_controller?
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure [message #20029 is a reply to message #20020] Mon, 10 September 2007 17:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Srivatsa Vaddagiri is currently offline  Srivatsa Vaddagiri
Messages: 241
Registered: August 2006
Senior Member
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 07:05:00PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Sep 10 2007 22:40, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> >+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> >+SUBSYS(cpuctlr)
> >+#endif
> 
> cpuctl, cpuctrl, cpu_controller?

*shrug* .. I used "cpuctlr" to mean "CPU Controller". Any other short names
would do. From your list, cpuctl or cpuctrl both qualifies IMO!

Unless folks have strong objection to it, I prefer "cptctlr", the way it is.

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure [message #20030 is a reply to message #20029] Mon, 10 September 2007 17:28 Go to previous message
Srivatsa Vaddagiri is currently offline  Srivatsa Vaddagiri
Messages: 241
Registered: August 2006
Senior Member
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 10:53:34PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> > cpuctl, cpuctrl, cpu_controller?
> 
> *shrug* .. I used "cpuctlr" to mean "CPU Controller". Any other short names
> would do. From your list, cpuctl or cpuctrl both qualifies IMO!
> 
> Unless folks have strong objection to it, I prefer "cptctlr", the way it is.

s/cptctlr/cpuctlr !

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
Previous Topic: [PATCH] Leases can be hidden by flocks
Next Topic: Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Jul 14 01:41:37 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02137 seconds