| 
		
			| Re: [patch 2/6] [Network namespace] Network device sharing by view [message #4015] | Mon, 26 June 2006 22:54  |  
			| 
				
				
					|  Herbert Poetzl Messages: 239
 Registered: February 2006
 | Senior Member |  |  |  
	| On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 03:13:17PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > Eric W. Biederman wrote:
 >
 > >Basically it is just a matter of:
 > >if (dest_mac == my_mac1) it is for device 1.
 > >If (dest_mac == my_mac2) it is for device 2.
 > >etc.
 > >
 > >At a small count of macs it is trivial to understand it will go
 > >fast for a larger count of macs it only works with a good data
 > >structure.  We don't hit any extra cache lines of the packet,
 > >and the above test can be collapsed with other routing lookup tests.
 >
 > I think you should do this at the layer-2 level, well before you get
 > to routing. That will make the virtual mac-vlan work with arbitrary
 > protocols and appear very much like a regular ethernet interface.
 > This approach worked well with .1q vlans, and with my version of the
 > mac-vlan module.
 
 yes, that sounds good to me, any numbers how that
 affects networking in general (performance wise and
 memory wise, i.e. caches and hashes) ...
 
 > Using the mac-vlan and source-based routing tables, I can give a
 > unique 'interface' to each process and have each process able to bind
 > to the same IP port, for instance. Using source-based routing (by
 > binding to a local IP explicitly and adding a route table for that
 > source IP), I can give unique default routes to each interface as
 > well. Since we cannot have more than 256 routing tables, this approach
 > is currently limitted to around 250 virtual interfaces, but that is
 > still a substantial amount.
 
 an typically that would be sufficient IMHO, but
 of course, a more 'general' hash tag would be
 better in the long run ...
 
 > My mac-vlan patch, redirect-device patch, and other hackings are
 > consolidated in this patch:
 >
 > http://www.candelatech.com/oss/candela_2.6.16.patch
 
 great! thanks!
 
 best,
 Herbert
 
 > Thanks,
 > Ben
 >
 > --
 > Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
 > Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
 |  
	|  |  |