> On 4/1/08, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
>  > > > > --- a/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h
>  > > > > +++ b/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h
>  > > > > @@ -42,3 +42,9 @@ SUBSYS(mem_cgroup)
>  > > > > #endif
>  > > > >
>  > > > > /* */
>  > > > > +
>  > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_DEVICE
>  > > > > +SUBSYS(devices)
>  > > > > +#endif
>  > > > > +
>  > > > > +/* */
>  > > >
>  > > > I don't know what this is, but it does not look like C...
>  > >
>  > > Huh?
>  >
>  > Empty comments as separators?
> 
>  They help when multiple people add such SUBSYS things and
>  do not have to fight rejects.
> 

Why not provide a interface to add subsystems at run-time instead?
Are there any reason for not letting a subsystem to be implemented as a
loadable module? IOW make cgroups usable by modules?

Thanks
Nikanth Karthikesan


_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers