if possible plz check with the patch attached.


Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> is it possible to get an access to your node to check?
> if so please send me crentials privately.
> also, if I will provide you a patch for testing will you be able to rebuild the kernel
> and check?
> 
> Thanks,
> Kirill
> 
> Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> 
>>On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP, Request from 00:1b:d5:2c:bf:38, length 308
>>>
>>>Here is request.
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>
>>
>>>>HN: tcpdump -n -i br107
>>>>255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP, Request from 00:1b:d5:2c:bf:38, length 308
>>>
>>>Here is too.
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>
>>
>>>>08:16:19.401886 00:1b:d4:7e:76:2a > 01:00:0c:cc:cc:cd SNAP Unnumbered, ui,
>>>>Flags [Command], length 50 08:16:21.185110 IP 192.168.8.254.67 >
>>>
>>>And here.
>>
>> Ooh? where?
>>
>>
>>
>>>>255.255.255.255.68: BOOTP/DHCP, Reply, length 300 08:16:21.187356 arp
>>
>> this is only a reply, this came from the other dhcp server, that I had to
>>ask to be set up few segments away from here...
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 


--- ./drivers/net/veth.c.ve8765	2007-09-28 14:21:33.000000000 +0400
+++ ./drivers/net/veth.c	2007-09-28 17:10:47.000000000 +0400
@@ -300,25 +300,6 @@ static int veth_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb
 
 	if (unlikely(rcv->owner_env->disable_net))
 		goto outf;
-	/* Filtering */
-	if (ve_is_super(dev->owner_env) &&
-			!veth_from_netdev(rcv)->allow_mac_change) {
-		/* from VE0 to VEX */
-		if (ve_is_super(rcv->owner_env))
-			goto out;
-		if (is_multicast_ether_addr(
-					((struct ethhdr *)skb->data)->h_dest))
-			goto out;
-		if (compare_ether_addr(((struct ethhdr *)skb->data)->h_dest,
-					rcv->dev_addr))
-			goto outf;
-	} else if (!ve_is_super(dev->owner_env) &&
-			!entry->allow_mac_change) {
-		/* from VE to VE0 */
-		if (compare_ether_addr(((struct ethhdr *)skb->data)->h_source,
-					dev->dev_addr))
-			goto outf;
-	}
 
 out:
 	skb->owner_env = rcv->owner_env;