| Re: Re: pspace name [message #6183] |
Mon, 11 September 2006 10:37  |
Cedric Le Goater
Messages: 443
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 01:52:39PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@us.ibm.com> writes:
>>
>>> I agree we should rename. I had suggested pid_space to "rhyme" wiht
>>> pidmap, but received no ack/nack. I meant to send another mail,
>>> specially after the is_init() collision recently.
>>> |
>>> | 'namespace' should probably be renamed to something like
>>> | 'mnt_namespace' ?
>
>>> While at it, should we change CLONE_NEWNS to CLONE_MNTNS ?
>> We need to retain the NEW in the clone flags. CLONE_NEWMNTNS perhaps.
>> Otherwise with clone at least we get impression of backward semantics.
>
> hmm, got no comment to my suggestion to use VFS instead
> of MNT or mount, was it silently ignored, disliked, or
> just lost?
mount point namespace is probably a bit more 'intuitive' than VFS namespace ?
C.
|
|
|
|
OpenVZ Forum
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
