Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH 1/4] userns: let clone_uts_ns() handle setting uts->user_ns
| [PATCH 1/4] userns: let clone_uts_ns() handle setting uts->user_ns [message #41797] |
Mon, 21 February 2011 04:01  |
serge
Messages: 72
Registered: January 2007
|
Member |
|
|
To do so we need to pass in the task_struct who'll get the utsname,
so we can get its user_ns.
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
---
include/linux/utsname.h | 10 ++++++----
kernel/nsproxy.c | 7 +------
kernel/utsname.c | 12 +++++++-----
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/utsname.h b/include/linux/utsname.h
index 85171be..165b17b 100644
--- a/include/linux/utsname.h
+++ b/include/linux/utsname.h
@@ -52,8 +52,9 @@ static inline void get_uts_ns(struct uts_namespace *ns)
kref_get(&ns->kref);
}
-extern struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(unsigned long flags,
- struct uts_namespace *ns);
+extern struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ unsigned long flags,
+ struct uts_namespace *ns);
extern void free_uts_ns(struct kref *kref);
static inline void put_uts_ns(struct uts_namespace *ns)
@@ -69,8 +70,9 @@ static inline void put_uts_ns(struct uts_namespace *ns)
{
}
-static inline struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(unsigned long flags,
- struct uts_namespace *ns)
+static inline struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ unsigned long flags,
+ struct uts_namespace *ns)
{
if (flags & CLONE_NEWUTS)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
diff --git a/kernel/nsproxy.c b/kernel/nsproxy.c
index b6dbff2..ffa6b67 100644
--- a/kernel/nsproxy.c
+++ b/kernel/nsproxy.c
@@ -69,16 +69,11 @@ static struct nsproxy *create_new_namespaces(unsigned long flags,
goto out_ns;
}
- new_nsp->uts_ns = copy_utsname(flags, tsk->nsproxy->uts_ns);
+ new_nsp->uts_ns = copy_utsname(tsk, flags, tsk->nsproxy->uts_ns);
if (IS_ERR(new_nsp->uts_ns)) {
err = PTR_ERR(new_nsp->uts_ns);
goto out_uts;
}
- if (new_nsp->uts_ns != tsk->nsproxy->uts_ns) {
- put_user_ns(new_nsp->uts_ns->user_ns);
- new_nsp->uts_ns->user_ns = task_cred_xxx(tsk, user)->user_ns;
- get_user_ns(new_nsp->uts_ns->user_ns);
- }
new_nsp->ipc_ns = copy_ipcs(flags, tsk->nsproxy->ipc_ns);
if (IS_ERR(new_nsp->ipc_ns)) {
diff --git a/kernel/utsname.c b/kernel/utsname.c
index a7b3a8d..9462580 100644
--- a/kernel/utsname.c
+++ b/kernel/utsname.c
@@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ static struct uts_namespace *create_uts_ns(void)
* @old_ns: namespace to clone
* Return NULL on error (failure to kmalloc), new ns otherwise
*/
-static struct uts_namespace *clone_uts_ns(struct uts_namespace *old_ns)
+static struct uts_namespace *clone_uts_ns(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ struct uts_namespace *old_ns)
{
struct uts_namespace *ns;
@@ -41,8 +42,7 @@ static struct uts_namespace *clone_uts_ns(struct uts_namespace *old_ns)
down_read(&uts_sem);
memcpy(&ns->name, &old_ns->name, sizeof(ns->name));
- ns->user_ns = old_ns->user_ns;
- get_user_ns(ns->user_ns);
+ ns->user_ns = get_user_ns(task_cred_xxx(tsk, user)->user_ns);
up_read(&uts_sem);
return ns;
}
@@ -53,7 +53,9 @@ static struct uts_namespace *clone_uts_ns(struct uts_namespace *old_ns)
* utsname of this process won't be seen by parent, and vice
* versa.
*/
-struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(unsigned long flags, struct uts_namespace *old_ns)
+struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ unsigned long flags,
+ struct uts_namespace *old_ns)
{
struct uts_namespace *new_ns;
@@ -63,7 +65,7 @@ struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(unsigned long flags, struct uts_namespace *ol
if (!(flags & CLONE_NEWUTS))
return old_ns;
- new_ns = clone_uts_ns(old_ns);
+ new_ns = clone_uts_ns(tsk, old_ns);
put_uts_ns(old_ns);
return new_ns;
--
1.7.0.4
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containe rs
|
|
|
|
| [PATCH 2/4] userns: let copy_ipcs handle setting ipc_ns->user_ns [message #41798 is a reply to message #41797] |
Mon, 21 February 2011 04:02  |
serge
Messages: 72
Registered: January 2007
|
Member |
|
|
To do that, we have to pass in the task_struct of the task which
will own the ipc_ns, so we can assign its user_ns.
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
---
include/linux/ipc_namespace.h | 8 +++++---
ipc/namespace.c | 12 +++++++-----
kernel/nsproxy.c | 7 +------
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h b/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
index 46d2eb4..9974429 100644
--- a/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
+++ b/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
@@ -92,7 +92,8 @@ static inline int mq_init_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns) { return 0; }
#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_IPC_NS)
-extern struct ipc_namespace *copy_ipcs(unsigned long flags,
+extern struct ipc_namespace *copy_ipcs(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ unsigned long flags,
struct ipc_namespace *ns);
static inline struct ipc_namespace *get_ipc_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns)
{
@@ -103,8 +104,9 @@ static inline struct ipc_namespace *get_ipc_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns)
extern void put_ipc_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns);
#else
-static inline struct ipc_namespace *copy_ipcs(unsigned long flags,
- struct ipc_namespace *ns)
+static inline struct ipc_namespace *copy_ipcs(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ unsigned long flags,
+ struct ipc_namespace *ns)
{
if (flags & CLONE_NEWIPC)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
diff --git a/ipc/namespace.c b/ipc/namespace.c
index aa18899..ee84882 100644
--- a/ipc/namespace.c
+++ b/ipc/namespace.c
@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@
#include "util.h"
-static struct ipc_namespace *create_ipc_ns(struct ipc_namespace *old_ns)
+static struct ipc_namespace *create_ipc_ns(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ struct ipc_namespace *old_ns)
{
struct ipc_namespace *ns;
int err;
@@ -44,17 +45,18 @@ static struct ipc_namespace *create_ipc_ns(struct ipc_namespace *old_ns)
ipcns_notify(IPCNS_CREATED);
register_ipcns_notifier(ns);
- ns->user_ns = old_ns->user_ns;
- get_user_ns(ns->user_ns);
+ ns->user_ns = get_user_ns(task_cred_xxx(tsk, user)->user_ns);
return ns;
}
-struct ipc_namespace *copy_ipcs(unsigned long flags, struct ipc_namespace *ns)
+struct ipc_namespace *copy_ipcs(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ unsigned long flags,
+ struct ipc_namespace *ns)
{
if (!(flags & CLONE_NEWIPC))
return get_ipc_ns(ns);
- return create_ipc_ns(ns);
+ return create_ipc_ns(tsk, ns);
}
/*
diff --git a/kernel/nsproxy.c b/kernel/nsproxy.c
index ffa6b67..b905ecc 100644
--- a/kernel/nsproxy.c
+++ b/kernel/nsproxy.c
@@ -75,16 +75,11 @@ static struct nsproxy *create_new_namespaces(unsigned long flags,
goto out_uts;
}
- new_nsp->ipc_ns = copy_ipcs(flags, tsk->nsproxy->ipc_ns);
+ new_nsp->ipc_ns = copy_ipcs(tsk, flags, tsk->nsproxy->ipc_ns);
if (IS_ERR(new_nsp->ipc_ns)) {
err = PTR_ERR(new_nsp->ipc_ns);
goto out_ipc;
}
- if (new_nsp->ipc_ns != tsk->nsproxy->ipc_ns) {
- put_user_ns(new_nsp->ipc_ns->user_ns);
- new_nsp->ipc_ns->user_ns = task_cred_xxx(tsk, user)->user_ns;
- get_user_ns(new_nsp->ipc_ns->user_ns);
- }
new_nsp->pid_ns = copy_pid_ns(flags, task_active_pid_ns(tsk));
if (IS_ERR(new_nsp->pid_ns)) {
--
1.7.0.4
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containe rs
|
|
|
|
| [PATCH 3/4] Add the required user_ns parameter to security_capable [message #41799 is a reply to message #41797] |
Mon, 21 February 2011 04:02 |
serge
Messages: 72
Registered: January 2007
|
Member |
|
|
Fixes a compile failure.
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
---
drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
index ea25e5b..90a6b04 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ pci_read_config(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
u8 *data = (u8*) buf;
/* Several chips lock up trying to read undefined config space */
- if (security_capable(filp->f_cred, CAP_SYS_ADMIN) == 0) {
+ if (security_capable(&init_user_ns, filp->f_cred, CAP_SYS_ADMIN) == 0) {
size = dev->cfg_size;
} else if (dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_CARDBUS) {
size = 128;
--
1.7.0.4
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containe rs
|
|
|
|
| [PATCH 4/4] userns: uts and ipc: fix checkpatch warning [message #41800 is a reply to message #41797] |
Mon, 21 February 2011 04:05 |
serge
Messages: 72
Registered: January 2007
|
Member |
|
|
As pointed out by Andrew Morton (and checkpatch), init/version.c
(and ipc/msgutil.c) should not have an extern declaration for
init_user_ns. Instead, move those to ipc_namespace.h and utsname.h.
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
---
include/linux/ipc_namespace.h | 3 ++-
include/linux/utsname.h | 1 +
init/version.c | 1 -
ipc/msgutil.c | 2 --
4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h b/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
index 9974429..ebd4a93 100644
--- a/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
+++ b/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
#define IPCNS_CALLBACK_PRI 0
+struct user_namespace;
+extern struct user_namespace init_user_ns;
struct ipc_ids {
int in_use;
@@ -24,7 +26,6 @@ struct ipc_ids {
struct idr ipcs_idr;
};
-struct user_namespace;
struct ipc_namespace {
atomic_t count;
struct ipc_ids ids[3];
diff --git a/include/linux/utsname.h b/include/linux/utsname.h
index 165b17b..69957ca 100644
--- a/include/linux/utsname.h
+++ b/include/linux/utsname.h
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct new_utsname {
#include <linux/err.h>
struct user_namespace;
+extern struct user_namespace init_user_ns;
struct uts_namespace {
struct kref kref;
diff --git a/init/version.c b/init/version.c
index 97bb86f..86fe0cc 100644
--- a/init/version.c
+++ b/init/version.c
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ extern int version_string(LINUX_VERSION_CODE);
int version_string(LINUX_VERSION_CODE);
#endif
-extern struct user_namespace init_user_ns;
struct uts_namespace init_uts_ns = {
.kref = {
.refcount = ATOMIC_INIT(2),
diff --git a/ipc/msgutil.c b/ipc/msgutil.c
index d91ff4b..8b5ce5d 100644
--- a/ipc/msgutil.c
+++ b/ipc/msgutil.c
@@ -20,8 +20,6 @@
DEFINE_SPINLOCK(mq_lock);
-extern struct user_namespace init_user_ns;
-
/*
* The next 2 defines are here bc this is the only file
* compiled when either CONFIG_SYSVIPC and CONFIG_POSIX_MQUEUE
--
1.7.0.4
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containe rs
|
|
|
|
| Re: [PATCH 1/4] userns: let clone_uts_ns() handle setting uts->user_ns [message #41802 is a reply to message #41797] |
Mon, 21 February 2011 10:03 |
Daniel Lezcano
Messages: 417
Registered: June 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 02/21/2011 05:01 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> To do so we need to pass in the task_struct who'll get the utsname,
> so we can get its user_ns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn<serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
> ---
> include/linux/utsname.h | 10 ++++++----
> kernel/nsproxy.c | 7 +------
> kernel/utsname.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/utsname.h b/include/linux/utsname.h
> index 85171be..165b17b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/utsname.h
> +++ b/include/linux/utsname.h
> @@ -52,8 +52,9 @@ static inline void get_uts_ns(struct uts_namespace *ns)
> kref_get(&ns->kref);
> }
>
> -extern struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(unsigned long flags,
> - struct uts_namespace *ns);
> +extern struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(struct task_struct *tsk,
> + unsigned long flags,
> + struct uts_namespace *ns);
Why don't we pass 'user_ns' instead of 'tsk' ? that will look
semantically clearer for the caller no ?
(example below).
> extern void free_uts_ns(struct kref *kref);
>
> static inline void put_uts_ns(struct uts_namespace *ns)
> @@ -69,8 +70,9 @@ static inline void put_uts_ns(struct uts_namespace *ns)
> {
> }
>
> -static inline struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(unsigned long flags,
> - struct uts_namespace *ns)
> +static inline struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(struct task_struct *tsk,
> + unsigned long flags,
> + struct uts_namespace *ns)
> {
> if (flags& CLONE_NEWUTS)
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> diff --git a/kernel/nsproxy.c b/kernel/nsproxy.c
> index b6dbff2..ffa6b67 100644
> --- a/kernel/nsproxy.c
> +++ b/kernel/nsproxy.c
> @@ -69,16 +69,11 @@ static struct nsproxy *create_new_namespaces(unsigned long flags,
> goto out_ns;
> }
>
> - new_nsp->uts_ns = copy_utsname(flags, tsk->nsproxy->uts_ns);
> + new_nsp->uts_ns = copy_utsname(tsk, flags, tsk->nsproxy->uts_ns);
> if (IS_ERR(new_nsp->uts_ns)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(new_nsp->uts_ns);
> goto out_uts;
> }
...
new_nsp->uts_ns = copy_utsname(flags, tsk->nsproxy->uts_ns, task_cred_xxx(tsk, user)->user_ns);
...
> - if (new_nsp->uts_ns != tsk->nsproxy->uts_ns) {
> - put_user_ns(new_nsp->uts_ns->user_ns);
> - new_nsp->uts_ns->user_ns = task_cred_xxx(tsk, user)->user_ns;
> - get_user_ns(new_nsp->uts_ns->user_ns);
> - }
>
> new_nsp->ipc_ns = copy_ipcs(flags, tsk->nsproxy->ipc_ns);
> if (IS_ERR(new_nsp->ipc_ns)) {
> diff --git a/kernel/utsname.c b/kernel/utsname.c
> index a7b3a8d..9462580 100644
> --- a/kernel/utsname.c
> +++ b/kernel/utsname.c
> @@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ static struct uts_namespace *create_uts_ns(void)
> * @old_ns: namespace to clone
> * Return NULL on error (failure to kmalloc), new ns otherwise
> */
> -static struct uts_namespace *clone_uts_ns(struct uts_namespace *old_ns)
> +static struct uts_namespace *clone_uts_ns(struct task_struct *tsk,
> + struct uts_namespace *old_ns)
> {
> struct uts_namespace *ns;
>
> @@ -41,8 +42,7 @@ static struct uts_namespace *clone_uts_ns(struct uts_namespace *old_ns)
>
> down_read(&uts_sem);
> memcpy(&ns->name,&old_ns->name, sizeof(ns->name));
> - ns->user_ns = old_ns->user_ns;
> - get_user_ns(ns->user_ns);
> + ns->user_ns = get_user_ns(task_cred_xxx(tsk, user)->user_ns);
> up_read(&uts_sem);
> return ns;
> }
> @@ -53,7 +53,9 @@ static struct uts_namespace *clone_uts_ns(struct uts_namespace *old_ns)
> * utsname of this process won't be seen by parent, and vice
> * versa.
> */
> -struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(unsigned long flags, struct uts_namespace *old_ns)
> +struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(struct task_struct *tsk,
> + unsigned long flags,
> + struct uts_namespace *old_ns)
> {
> struct uts_namespace *new_ns;
>
> @@ -63,7 +65,7 @@ struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(unsigned long flags, struct uts_namespace *ol
> if (!(flags& CLONE_NEWUTS))
> return old_ns;
>
> - new_ns = clone_uts_ns(old_ns);
> + new_ns = clone_uts_ns(tsk, old_ns);
>
> put_uts_ns(old_ns);
> return new_ns;
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containe rs
|
|
|
|
| Re: [PATCH 2/4] userns: let copy_ipcs handle setting ipc_ns->user_ns [message #41803 is a reply to message #41798] |
Mon, 21 February 2011 10:05 |
Daniel Lezcano
Messages: 417
Registered: June 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 02/21/2011 05:02 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> To do that, we have to pass in the task_struct of the task which
> will own the ipc_ns, so we can assign its user_ns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn<serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
> ---
> include/linux/ipc_namespace.h | 8 +++++---
> ipc/namespace.c | 12 +++++++-----
> kernel/nsproxy.c | 7 +------
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h b/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
> index 46d2eb4..9974429 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
> @@ -92,7 +92,8 @@ static inline int mq_init_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns) { return 0; }
> #endif
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_IPC_NS)
> -extern struct ipc_namespace *copy_ipcs(unsigned long flags,
> +extern struct ipc_namespace *copy_ipcs(struct task_struct *tsk,
> + unsigned long flags,
> struct ipc_namespace *ns);
Same comment than patch 1/4
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containe rs
|
|
|
|
| Re: [PATCH 1/4] userns: let clone_uts_ns() handle setting uts->user_ns [message #41806 is a reply to message #41802] |
Mon, 21 February 2011 13:41 |
Oleg Nesterov
Messages: 143
Registered: August 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 02/21, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> On 02/21/2011 05:01 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> To do so we need to pass in the task_struct who'll get the utsname,
>> so we can get its user_ns.
>>
>> -extern struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(unsigned long flags,
>> - struct uts_namespace *ns);
>> +extern struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(struct task_struct *tsk,
>> + unsigned long flags,
>> + struct uts_namespace *ns);
>
> Why don't we pass 'user_ns' instead of 'tsk' ? that will look
> semantically clearer for the caller no ?
> (example below).
> ...
>
> new_nsp->uts_ns = copy_utsname(flags, tsk->nsproxy->uts_ns, task_cred_xxx(tsk, user)->user_ns);
To me tsk looks more readable, I mean
new_nsp->uts_ns = copy_utsname(flags, tsk);
copy_utsname() can find both uts_ns and user_ns looking at task_strcut.
But this is cosmetic and up to you and Serge.
But. I think it makes sense to pass "tsk" argument to copy_pid_ns() as well.
This way we can remove some CLONE_PIDNS code in copy_process(), and this
looks like a nice cleanaup (even if minor) to me.
Oleg.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containe rs
|
|
|
|
| Re: [PATCH 1/4] userns: let clone_uts_ns() handle setting uts->user_ns [message #41807 is a reply to message #41806] |
Mon, 21 February 2011 13:58 |
serge
Messages: 72
Registered: January 2007
|
Member |
|
|
Quoting Oleg Nesterov (oleg@redhat.com):
> On 02/21, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >
> > On 02/21/2011 05:01 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >> To do so we need to pass in the task_struct who'll get the utsname,
> >> so we can get its user_ns.
> >>
> >> -extern struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(unsigned long flags,
> >> - struct uts_namespace *ns);
> >> +extern struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(struct task_struct *tsk,
> >> + unsigned long flags,
> >> + struct uts_namespace *ns);
> >
> > Why don't we pass 'user_ns' instead of 'tsk' ? that will look
> > semantically clearer for the caller no ?
> > (example below).
> > ...
> >
> > new_nsp->uts_ns = copy_utsname(flags, tsk->nsproxy->uts_ns, task_cred_xxx(tsk, user)->user_ns);
>
> To me tsk looks more readable, I mean
>
> new_nsp->uts_ns = copy_utsname(flags, tsk);
>
> copy_utsname() can find both uts_ns and user_ns looking at task_strcut.
Uh, yeah. I should remove the 'ns' argument there shouldn't I.
Daniel, does that sway your opinion then?
thanks,
-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containe rs
|
|
|
|
| Re: [PATCH 1/4] userns: let clone_uts_ns() handle setting uts->user_ns [message #41808 is a reply to message #41807] |
Mon, 21 February 2011 14:23 |
Daniel Lezcano
Messages: 417
Registered: June 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 02/21/2011 02:58 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Oleg Nesterov (oleg@redhat.com):
>> On 02/21, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 02/21/2011 05:01 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>>>> To do so we need to pass in the task_struct who'll get the utsname,
>>>> so we can get its user_ns.
>>>>
>>>> -extern struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(unsigned long flags,
>>>> - struct uts_namespace *ns);
>>>> +extern struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(struct task_struct *tsk,
>>>> + unsigned long flags,
>>>> + struct uts_namespace *ns);
>>> Why don't we pass 'user_ns' instead of 'tsk' ? that will look
>>> semantically clearer for the caller no ?
>>> (example below).
>>> ...
>>>
>>> new_nsp->uts_ns = copy_utsname(flags, tsk->nsproxy->uts_ns, task_cred_xxx(tsk, user)->user_ns);
>> To me tsk looks more readable, I mean
>>
>> new_nsp->uts_ns = copy_utsname(flags, tsk);
>>
>> copy_utsname() can find both uts_ns and user_ns looking at task_strcut.
> Uh, yeah. I should remove the 'ns' argument there shouldn't I.
>
> Daniel, does that sway your opinion then?
Well, I prefer to pass the needed parameters to a function. AFAICS,
'tsk' is not really needed but 'user_ns'.
But it is a detail, so if passing the tsk parameter in the other copy_*
functions helps to cleanup, that will be consistent.
So I am fine with that.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containe rs
|
|
|
|
| [PATCH 1/4] userns: let clone_uts_ns() handle setting uts->user_ns [message #41871 is a reply to message #41797] |
Thu, 24 February 2011 00:21 |
serge
Messages: 72
Registered: January 2007
|
Member |
|
|
To do so we need to pass in the task_struct who'll get the utsname,
so we can get its user_ns.
Changelog:
Feb 23: As per Oleg's coment, just pass in tsk.
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
---
include/linux/utsname.h | 6 +++---
kernel/nsproxy.c | 7 +------
kernel/utsname.c | 12 +++++++-----
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/utsname.h b/include/linux/utsname.h
index 85171be..21b4566 100644
--- a/include/linux/utsname.h
+++ b/include/linux/utsname.h
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static inline void get_uts_ns(struct uts_namespace *ns)
}
extern struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(unsigned long flags,
- struct uts_namespace *ns);
+ struct task_struct *tsk);
extern void free_uts_ns(struct kref *kref);
static inline void put_uts_ns(struct uts_namespace *ns)
@@ -70,12 +70,12 @@ static inline void put_uts_ns(struct uts_namespace *ns)
}
static inline struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(unsigned long flags,
- struct uts_namespace *ns)
+ struct task_struct *tsk)
{
if (flags & CLONE_NEWUTS)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
- return ns;
+ return tsk->nsproxy->uts_ns;
}
#endif
diff --git a/kernel/nsproxy.c b/kernel/nsproxy.c
index b6dbff2..ac8a56e 100644
--- a/kernel/nsproxy.c
+++ b/kernel/nsproxy.c
@@ -69,16 +69,11 @@ static struct nsproxy *create_new_namespaces(unsigned long flags,
goto out_ns;
}
- new_nsp->uts_ns = copy_utsname(flags, tsk->nsproxy->uts_ns);
+ new_nsp->uts_ns = copy_utsname(flags, tsk);
if (IS_ERR(new_nsp->uts_ns)) {
err = PTR_ERR(new_nsp->uts_ns);
goto out_uts;
}
- if (new_nsp->uts_ns != tsk->nsproxy->uts_ns) {
- put_user_ns(new_nsp->uts_ns->user_ns);
- new_nsp->uts_ns->user_ns = task_cred_xxx(tsk, user)->user_ns;
- get_user_ns(new_nsp->uts_ns->user_ns);
- }
new_nsp->ipc_ns = copy_ipcs(flags, tsk->nsproxy->ipc_ns);
if (IS_ERR(new_nsp->ipc_ns)) {
diff --git a/kernel/utsname.c b/kernel/utsname.c
index a7b3a8d..4464617 100644
--- a/kernel/utsname.c
+++ b/kernel/utsname.c
@@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ static struct uts_namespace *create_uts_ns(void)
* @old_ns: namespace to clone
* Return NULL on error (failure to kmalloc), new ns otherwise
*/
-static struct uts_namespace *clone_uts_ns(struct uts_namespace *old_ns)
+static struct uts_namespace *clone_uts_ns(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ struct uts_namespace *old_ns)
{
struct uts_namespace *ns;
@@ -41,8 +42,7 @@ static struct uts_namespace *clone_uts_ns(struct uts_namespace *old_ns)
down_read(&uts_sem);
memcpy(&ns->name, &old_ns->name, sizeof(ns->name));
- ns->user_ns = old_ns->user_ns;
- get_user_ns(ns->user_ns);
+ ns->user_ns = get_user_ns(task_cred_xxx(tsk, user)->user_ns);
up_read(&uts_sem);
return ns;
}
@@ -53,8 +53,10 @@ static struct uts_namespace *clone_uts_ns(struct uts_namespace *old_ns)
* utsname of this process won't be seen by parent, and vice
* versa.
*/
-struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(unsigned long flags, struct uts_namespace *old_ns)
+struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(unsigned long flags,
+ struct task_struct *tsk)
{
+ struct uts_namespace *old_ns = tsk->nsproxy->uts_ns;
struct uts_namespace *new_ns;
BUG_ON(!old_ns);
@@ -63,7 +65,7 @@ struct uts_namespace *copy_utsname(unsigned long flags, struct uts_namespace *ol
if (!(flags & CLONE_NEWUTS))
return old_ns;
- new_ns = clone_uts_ns(old_ns);
+ new_ns = clone_uts_ns(tsk, old_ns);
put_uts_ns(old_ns);
return new_ns;
--
1.7.0.4
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containe rs
|
|
|
|
| [PATCH 2/4] userns: let copy_ipcs handle setting ipc_ns->user_ns [message #41872 is a reply to message #41798] |
Thu, 24 February 2011 00:22 |
serge
Messages: 72
Registered: January 2007
|
Member |
|
|
To do that, we have to pass in the task_struct of the task which
will own the ipc_ns, so we can assign its user_ns.
Changelog:
Feb 23: As per Oleg comment, just pass in tsk. To get the
ipc_ns from the nsproxy we need to include nsproxy.h
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
---
include/linux/ipc_namespace.h | 7 ++++---
ipc/namespace.c | 13 ++++++++-----
kernel/nsproxy.c | 7 +------
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h b/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
index 46d2eb4..c079d09 100644
--- a/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
+++ b/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include <linux/idr.h>
#include <linux/rwsem.h>
#include <linux/notifier.h>
+#include <linux/nsproxy.h>
/*
* ipc namespace events
@@ -93,7 +94,7 @@ static inline int mq_init_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns) { return 0; }
#if defined(CONFIG_IPC_NS)
extern struct ipc_namespace *copy_ipcs(unsigned long flags,
- struct ipc_namespace *ns);
+ struct task_struct *tsk);
static inline struct ipc_namespace *get_ipc_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns)
{
if (ns)
@@ -104,12 +105,12 @@ static inline struct ipc_namespace *get_ipc_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns)
extern void put_ipc_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns);
#else
static inline struct ipc_namespace *copy_ipcs(unsigned long flags,
- struct ipc_namespace *ns)
+ struct task_struct *tsk)
{
if (flags & CLONE_NEWIPC)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
- return ns;
+ return tsk->nsproxy->ipc_ns;
}
static inline struct ipc_namespace *get_ipc_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns)
diff --git a/ipc/namespace.c b/ipc/namespace.c
index aa18899..3c3e522 100644
--- a/ipc/namespace.c
+++ b/ipc/namespace.c
@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@
#include "util.h"
-static struct ipc_namespace *create_ipc_ns(struct ipc_namespace *old_ns)
+static struct ipc_namespace *create_ipc_ns(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ struct ipc_namespace *old_ns)
{
struct ipc_namespace *ns;
int err;
@@ -44,17 +45,19 @@ static struct ipc_namespace *create_ipc_ns(struct ipc_namespace *old_ns)
ipcns_notify(IPCNS_CREATED);
register_ipcns_notifier(ns);
- ns->user_ns = old_ns->user_ns;
- get_user_ns(ns->user_ns);
+ ns->user_ns = get_user_ns(task_cred_xxx(tsk, user)->user_ns);
return ns;
}
-struct ipc_namespace *copy_ipcs(unsigned long flags, struct ipc_namespace *ns)
+struct ipc_namespace *copy_ipcs(unsigned long flags,
+ struct task_struct *tsk)
{
+ struct ipc_namespace *ns = tsk->nsproxy->ipc_ns;
+
if (!(flags & CLONE_NEWIPC))
return get_ipc_ns(ns);
- return create_ipc_ns(ns);
+ return create_ipc_ns(tsk, ns);
}
/*
diff --git a/kernel/nsproxy.c b/kernel/nsproxy.c
index ac8a56e..a05d191 100644
--- a/kernel/nsproxy.c
+++ b/kernel/nsproxy.c
@@ -75,16 +75,11 @@ static struct nsproxy *create_new_namespaces(unsigned long flags,
goto out_uts;
}
- new_nsp->ipc_ns = copy_ipcs(flags, tsk->nsproxy->ipc_ns);
+ new_nsp->ipc_ns = copy_ipcs(flags, tsk);
if (IS_ERR(new_nsp->ipc_ns)) {
err = PTR_ERR(new_nsp->ipc_ns);
goto out_ipc;
}
- if (new_nsp->ipc_ns != tsk->nsproxy->ipc_ns) {
- put_user_ns(new_nsp->ipc_ns->user_ns);
- new_nsp->ipc_ns->user_ns = task_cred_xxx(tsk, user)->user_ns;
- get_user_ns(new_nsp->ipc_ns->user_ns);
- }
new_nsp->pid_ns = copy_pid_ns(flags, task_active_pid_ns(tsk));
if (IS_ERR(new_nsp->pid_ns)) {
--
1.7.0.4
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containe rs
|
|
|
|
| [PATCH 5/4] Clean up capability.h and capability.c [message #41873 is a reply to message #41797] |
Thu, 24 February 2011 00:22 |
serge
Messages: 72
Registered: January 2007
|
Member |
|
|
Convert macros to functions to let type safety do its thing. Switch
some functions from ints to more appropriate bool. Move all forward
declarations together to top of the #ifdef __KERNEL__ section. Use
kernel-doc format for comments.
Some macros couldn't be converted because they use functions from
security.h which sometimes are extern and sometimes static inline,
and we don't want to #include security.h in capability.h.
Also add a real current_user_ns function (and convert the existing
macro to _current_user_ns() so we can use it in capability.h
without #including cred.h.
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
---
include/linux/capability.h | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
include/linux/cred.h | 4 +++-
kernel/capability.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
kernel/cred.c | 5 +++++
4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/capability.h b/include/linux/capability.h
index bc0f262..688462f 100644
--- a/include/linux/capability.h
+++ b/include/linux/capability.h
@@ -368,6 +368,17 @@ struct cpu_vfs_cap_data {
#ifdef __KERNEL__
+struct dentry;
+struct user_namespace;
+
+extern struct user_namespace init_user_ns;
+
+struct user_namespace *current_user_ns(void);
+
+extern const kernel_cap_t __cap_empty_set;
+extern const kernel_cap_t __cap_full_set;
+extern const kernel_cap_t __cap_init_eff_set;
+
/*
* Internal kernel functions only
*/
@@ -530,10 +541,6 @@ static inline kernel_cap_t cap_raise_nfsd_set(const kernel_cap_t a,
cap_intersect(permitted, __cap_nfsd_set));
}
-extern const kernel_cap_t __cap_empty_set;
-extern const kernel_cap_t __cap_full_set;
-extern const kernel_cap_t __cap_init_eff_set;
-
/**
* has_capability - Determine if a task has a superior capability available
* @t: The task in question
@@ -560,18 +567,25 @@ extern const kernel_cap_t __cap_init_eff_set;
* Note that this does not set PF_SUPERPRIV on the task.
*/
#define has_capability_noaudit(t, cap) \
- (security_real_capable_noaudit((t), &init_user_ns, (cap)) == 0)
+ (security_real_capable_noaudit((t), &init_user_ns, (cap)) == 0)
-struct user_namespace;
-extern struct user_namespace init_user_ns;
-extern int capable(int cap);
-extern int ns_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap);
-extern int task_ns_capable(struct task_struct *t, int cap);
+extern bool capable(int cap);
+extern bool ns_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap);
+extern bool task_ns_capable(struct task_struct *t, int cap);
-#define nsown_capable(cap) (ns_capable(current_user_ns(), (cap)))
+/**
+ * nsown_capable - Check superior capability to one's own user_ns
+ * @cap: The capability in question
+ *
+ * Return true if the current task has the given superior capability
+ * targeted at its own user namespace.
+ */
+static inline bool nsown_capable(int cap)
+{
+ return ns_capable(current_user_ns(), cap);
+}
/* audit system wants to get cap info from files as well */
-struct dentry;
extern int get_vfs_caps_from_disk(const struct dentry *dentry, struct cpu_vfs_cap_data *cpu_caps);
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
diff --git a/include/linux/cred.h b/include/linux/cred.h
index 4aaeab3..9aeeb0b 100644
--- a/include/linux/cred.h
+++ b/include/linux/cred.h
@@ -354,9 +354,11 @@ static inline void put_cred(const struct cred *_cred)
#define current_fsgid() (current_cred_xxx(fsgid))
#define current_cap() (current_cred_xxx(cap_effective))
#define current_user() (current_cred_xxx(user))
-#define current_user_ns() (current_cred_xxx(user)->user_ns)
+#define _current_user_ns() (current_cred_xxx(user)->user_ns)
#define current_security() (current_cred_xxx(security))
+extern struct user_namespace *current_user_ns(void);
+
#define current_uid_gid(_uid, _gid) \
do { \
const struct cred *__cred; \
diff --git a/kernel/capability.c b/kernel/capability.c
index 916658c..0a3d2c8 100644
--- a/kernel/capability.c
+++ b/kernel/capability.c
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ error:
* This sets PF_SUPERPRIV on the task if the capability is available on the
* assumption that it's about to be used.
*/
-int capable(int cap)
+bool capable(int cap)
{
return ns_capable(&init_user_ns, cap);
}
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(capable);
* This sets PF_SUPERPRIV on the task if the capability is available on the
* assumption that it's about to be used.
*/
-int ns_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
+bool ns_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
{
if (unlikely(!cap_valid(cap))) {
printk(KERN_CRIT "capable() called with invalid cap=%u\n", cap);
@@ -326,17 +326,21 @@ int ns_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap)
if (security_capable(ns, current_cred(), cap) == 0) {
current->flags |= PF_SUPERPRIV;
- return 1;
+ return true;
}
- return 0;
+ return false;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ns_capable);
-/*
- * does current have capability 'cap' to the user namespace of task
- * 't'. Return true if it does, false otherwise.
+/**
+ * task_ns_capable - Determine whether current task has a superior
+ * capability targeted at a specific task's user namespace.
+ * @t: The task whose user namespace is targeted.
+ * @cap: The capability in question.
+ *
+ * Return true if it does, false otherwise.
*/
-int task_ns_capable(struct task_struct *t, int cap)
+bool task_ns_capable(struct task_struct *t, int cap)
{
return ns_capable(task_cred_xxx(t, user)->user_ns, cap);
}
diff --git a/kernel/cred.c b/kernel/cred.c
index 3a9d6dd..e447fa2 100644
--- a/kernel/cred.c
+++ b/kernel/cred.c
@@ -741,6 +741,11 @@ int set_create_files_as(struct cred *new, struct inode *inode)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_create_files_as);
+struct user_namespace *current_user_ns(void)
+{
+ return _current_user_ns();
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_CREDENTIALS
bool creds_are_invalid(const struct cred *cred)
--
1.7.0.4
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containe rs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed May 01 19:47:27 GMT 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01826 seconds
|
OpenVZ Forum
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
