Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH][NETNS] Use list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse in setup_net
[PATCH][NETNS] Use list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse in setup_net [message #20363] |
Mon, 17 September 2007 11:02  |
Pavel Emelianov
Messages: 1149 Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I proposed introducing a list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse
macro to be used in setup_net() when unrolling the failed
->init callback.
Here is the macro and some more cleanup in the setup_net() itself
to remove one variable from the stack :) Minor, but the code
looks nicer.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
include/linux/list.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
net/core/net_namespace.c | 8 +++-----
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/list.h b/include/linux/list.h
index f29fc9c..ad9dcb9 100644
--- a/include/linux/list.h
+++ b/include/linux/list.h
@@ -525,6 +525,20 @@ static inline void list_splice_init_rcu(
pos = list_entry(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member))
/**
+ * list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse - iterate backwards from the given point
+ * @pos: the type * to use as a loop cursor.
+ * @head: the head for your list.
+ * @member: the name of the list_struct within the struct.
+ *
+ * Start to iterate over list of given type backwards, continuing after
+ * the current position.
+ */
+#define list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(pos, head, member) \
+ for (pos = list_entry(pos->member.prev, typeof(*pos), member); \
+ prefetch(pos->member.prev), &pos->member != (head); \
+ pos = list_entry(pos->member.prev, typeof(*pos), member))
+
+/**
* list_for_each_entry_from - iterate over list of given type from the current point
* @pos: the type * to use as a loop cursor.
* @head: the head for your list.
diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
index 1fc513c..a9dd261 100644
--- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
+++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
@@ -102,7 +102,6 @@ static int setup_net(struct net *net)
{
/* Must be called with net_mutex held */
struct pernet_operations *ops;
- struct list_head *ptr;
int error;
memset(net, 0, sizeof(struct net));
@@ -110,8 +109,7 @@ static int setup_net(struct net *net)
atomic_set(&net->use_count, 0);
error = 0;
- list_for_each(ptr, &pernet_list) {
- ops = list_entry(ptr, struct pernet_operations, list);
+ list_for_each_entry(ops, &pernet_list, list) {
if (ops->init) {
error = ops->init(net);
if (error < 0)
@@ -120,12 +118,12 @@ static int setup_net(struct net *net)
}
out:
return error;
+
out_undo:
/* Walk through the list backwards calling the exit functions
* for the pernet modules whose init functions did not fail.
*/
- for (ptr = ptr->prev; ptr != &pernet_list; ptr = ptr->prev) {
- ops = list_entry(ptr, struct pernet_operations, list);
+ list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(ops, &pernet_list, list) {
if (ops->exit)
ops->exit(net);
}
|
|
|
Re: [PATCH][NETNS] Use list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse in setup_net [message #20375 is a reply to message #20363] |
Mon, 17 September 2007 13:07   |
ebiederm
Messages: 1354 Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> writes:
> I proposed introducing a list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse
> macro to be used in setup_net() when unrolling the failed
> ->init callback.
>
> Here is the macro and some more cleanup in the setup_net() itself
> to remove one variable from the stack :) Minor, but the code
> looks nicer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
> Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Pavel if you are going down this route. Could you look at
cleanup_net as well. The reverse walk there could probably
benefit from being list_for_each_entry_reverse.
Eric
>
> ---
>
> include/linux/list.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> net/core/net_namespace.c | 8 +++-----
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/list.h b/include/linux/list.h
> index f29fc9c..ad9dcb9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/list.h
> +++ b/include/linux/list.h
> @@ -525,6 +525,20 @@ static inline void list_splice_init_rcu(
> pos = list_entry(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member))
>
> /**
> + * list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse - iterate backwards from the given
> point
> + * @pos: the type * to use as a loop cursor.
> + * @head: the head for your list.
> + * @member: the name of the list_struct within the struct.
> + *
> + * Start to iterate over list of given type backwards, continuing after
> + * the current position.
> + */
> +#define list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(pos, head, member) \
> + for (pos = list_entry(pos->member.prev, typeof(*pos), member); \
> + prefetch(pos->member.prev), &pos->member != (head); \
> + pos = list_entry(pos->member.prev, typeof(*pos), member))
> +
> +/**
> * list_for_each_entry_from - iterate over list of given type from the current
> point
> * @pos: the type * to use as a loop cursor.
> * @head: the head for your list.
> diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
> index 1fc513c..a9dd261 100644
> --- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
> +++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
> @@ -102,7 +102,6 @@ static int setup_net(struct net *net)
> {
> /* Must be called with net_mutex held */
> struct pernet_operations *ops;
> - struct list_head *ptr;
> int error;
>
> memset(net, 0, sizeof(struct net));
> @@ -110,8 +109,7 @@ static int setup_net(struct net *net)
> atomic_set(&net->use_count, 0);
>
> error = 0;
> - list_for_each(ptr, &pernet_list) {
> - ops = list_entry(ptr, struct pernet_operations, list);
> + list_for_each_entry(ops, &pernet_list, list) {
> if (ops->init) {
> error = ops->init(net);
> if (error < 0)
> @@ -120,12 +118,12 @@ static int setup_net(struct net *net)
> }
> out:
> return error;
> +
> out_undo:
> /* Walk through the list backwards calling the exit functions
> * for the pernet modules whose init functions did not fail.
> */
> - for (ptr = ptr->prev; ptr != &pernet_list; ptr = ptr->prev) {
> - ops = list_entry(ptr, struct pernet_operations, list);
> + list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(ops, &pernet_list, list) {
> if (ops->exit)
> ops->exit(net);
> }
|
|
|
[PATCH][NETNS] Use list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse in setup_net [message #20380 is a reply to message #20375] |
Mon, 17 September 2007 13:54   |
Pavel Emelianov
Messages: 1149 Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
[snip]
> Pavel if you are going down this route. Could you look at
> cleanup_net as well. The reverse walk there could probably
> benefit from being list_for_each_entry_reverse.
Oh! Thanks a lot ;) Here's the new patch.
Log:
I proposed introducing a list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse
macro to be used in setup_net() when unrolling the failed
->init callback.
Here is the macro and some more cleanup in the setup_net() itself
to remove one variable from the stack :) Minor, but the code
looks nicer.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
diff --git a/include/linux/list.h b/include/linux/list.h
index f29fc9c..ad9dcb9 100644
--- a/include/linux/list.h
+++ b/include/linux/list.h
@@ -525,6 +525,20 @@ static inline void list_splice_init_rcu(
pos = list_entry(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member))
/**
+ * list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse - iterate backwards from the given point
+ * @pos: the type * to use as a loop cursor.
+ * @head: the head for your list.
+ * @member: the name of the list_struct within the struct.
+ *
+ * Start to iterate over list of given type backwards, continuing after
+ * the current position.
+ */
+#define list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(pos, head, member) \
+ for (pos = list_entry(pos->member.prev, typeof(*pos), member); \
+ prefetch(pos->member.prev), &pos->member != (head); \
+ pos = list_entry(pos->member.prev, typeof(*pos), member))
+
+/**
* list_for_each_entry_from - iterate over list of given type from the current point
* @pos: the type * to use as a loop cursor.
* @head: the head for your list.
diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
index 1fc513c..0e6cb02 100644
--- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
+++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
@@ -56,7 +56,6 @@ static void net_free(struct net *net)
static void cleanup_net(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct pernet_operations *ops;
- struct list_head *ptr;
struct net *net;
net = container_of(work, struct net, work);
@@ -69,8 +68,7 @@ static void cleanup_net(struct work_stru
net_unlock();
/* Run all of the network namespace exit methods */
- list_for_each_prev(ptr, &pernet_list) {
- ops = list_entry(ptr, struct pernet_operations, list);
+ list_for_each_entry_reverse(ops, &pernet_list, list) {
if (ops->exit)
ops->exit(net);
}
@@ -102,7 +100,6 @@ static int setup_net(struct net *net)
{
/* Must be called with net_mutex held */
struct pernet_operations *ops;
- struct list_head *ptr;
int error;
memset(net, 0, sizeof(struct net));
@@ -110,8 +107,7 @@ static int setup_net(struct net *net)
atomic_set(&net->use_count, 0);
error = 0;
- list_for_each(ptr, &pernet_list) {
- ops = list_entry(ptr, struct pernet_operations, list);
+ list_for_each_entry(ops, &pernet_list, list) {
if (ops->init) {
error = ops->init(net);
if (error < 0)
@@ -120,12 +116,12 @@ static int setup_net(struct net *net)
}
out:
return error;
+
out_undo:
/* Walk through the list backwards calling the exit functions
* for the pernet modules whose init functions did not fail.
*/
- for (ptr = ptr->prev; ptr != &pernet_list; ptr = ptr->prev) {
- ops = list_entry(ptr, struct pernet_operations, list);
+ list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(ops, &pernet_list, list) {
if (ops->exit)
ops->exit(net);
}
|
|
|
Re: [PATCH][NETNS] Use list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse in setup_net [message #20438 is a reply to message #20375] |
Tue, 18 September 2007 01:58  |
davem
Messages: 463 Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 07:07:42 -0600
> Pavel if you are going down this route. Could you look at
> cleanup_net as well. The reverse walk there could probably
> benefit from being list_for_each_entry_reverse.
Pavel please resubmit this work after everything has been
resolved, thanks.
If you have already, please resend as I don't have a copy.
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Aug 25 13:44:40 GMT 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.13613 seconds
|