Home » Mailing lists » Users » nginx, inside openvz CT, worker_cpu_affinity
| nginx, inside openvz CT, worker_cpu_affinity [message #47302] |
Sat, 28 July 2012 14:34  |
Nick Knutov
Messages: 2
Registered: February 2011
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Hello all,
> http://nginx.org/en/docs/ngx_core_module.html#worker_cpu_aff inity
>
> worker_processes 4;
> worker_cpu_affinity 0001 0010 0100 1000;
>
> "Binds worker processes to the sets of CPUs."
Does it make sense inside OpenVZ container?
Will it work if --cpus does not specified in CT config?
How will it work, if --cpus is specified and less then physical cores?
How will it work, if --cpus is specified and CPU has hyper-threading and
1) --cpus less then cpu cores
2) or --cpus less and odd(!) (example: --cpus: 3, physical CPU cores: 4
+ HT)
--
Best Regards,
Nick Knutov
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: nginx, inside openvz CT, worker_cpu_affinity [message #47344 is a reply to message #47331] |
Tue, 31 July 2012 15:14  |
Solar Designer
Messages: 5
Registered: August 2011
|
Junior Member |
|
|
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:52:56PM +0400, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> Here is an answer from Vladimir Davydov, who maintains scheduler in
> vzkernel.
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:29:43AM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > http://nginx.org/en/docs/ngx_core_module.html#worker_cpu_aff inity
> > >
> > > worker_processes 4;
> > > worker_cpu_affinity 0001 0010 0100 1000;
> > >
> > > "Binds worker processes to the sets of CPUs."
> > > Does it make sense inside OpenVZ container?
> >
> > It never works. CPU affinity masks are ignored inside containers.
I don't know about nginx in particular, but CPU affinity masks certainly
work for me in OpenVZ containers, at least on RHEL5'ish kernels. I've
just re-tested on this one:
$ uname -mrs
Linux 2.6.18-308.4.1.el5.028stab100.2.owl1 x86_64
Specifically, sched_setaffinity() in custom code (custom patch to Apache's
suEXEC) and libgomp's GOMP_CPU_AFFINITY env var both work just fine.
Vladimir - does your comment apply to some other kernel versions?
RHEL6'ish maybe? It'd be good to know and be prepared... and it'd be
really unfortunate to lose this functionality when we finally move to
RHEL6'ish kernels (soonish).
Thanks,
Alexander
|
|
|
|
| Re: nginx, inside openvz CT, worker_cpu_affinity [message #47348 is a reply to message #47344] |
Tue, 31 July 2012 18:41 |
Vladimir Davydov
Messages: 5
Registered: July 2012
|
Junior Member |
|
|
[Re-sending as it seems that for some reason the message was not delivered to the list]
On 07/31/2012 07:14 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:52:56PM +0400, Andrey Vagin wrote:
>> Here is an answer from Vladimir Davydov, who maintains scheduler in
>> vzkernel.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:29:43AM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
>>> http://nginx.org/en/docs/ngx_core_module.html#worker_cpu_aff inity
>>>>
>>>> worker_processes 4;
>>>> worker_cpu_affinity 0001 0010 0100 1000;
>>>>
>>>> "Binds worker processes to the sets of CPUs."
>>>> Does it make sense inside OpenVZ container?
>>> It never works. CPU affinity masks are ignored inside containers.
> I don't know about nginx in particular, but CPU affinity masks certainly
> work for me in OpenVZ containers, at least on RHEL5'ish kernels. I've
> just re-tested on this one:
>
> $ uname -mrs
> Linux 2.6.18-308.4.1.el5.028stab100.2.owl1 x86_64
>
> Specifically, sched_setaffinity() in custom code (custom patch to Apache's
> suEXEC) and libgomp's GOMP_CPU_AFFINITY env var both work just fine.
>
> Vladimir - does your comment apply to some other kernel versions?
> RHEL6'ish maybe? It'd be good to know and be prepared... and it'd be
> really unfortunate to lose this functionality when we finally move to
> RHEL6'ish kernels (soonish).
In RHEL5-based kernels we had the notion of virtual cpus: tasks were
scheduled on vcpus while the vcpus were somehow distributed among
physical cpus. The sched_setaffinity syscall could be used to bind tasks
to vcpus then.
This concept was cumbersome and often sub-optimal so in RHEL6 we decided
to drop it: currently setting nr_cpus limit for a container is actually
equivalent to setting cpulimit. The decision is justified by the fact
that the latest Linux scheduler is smart enough to gather actively
interacting tasks together so that there is no need to limit parallelism
artificially.
As a result, cpu affinity support was dropped. Tasks can still use the
sched_setaffinity syscall, but it will be ignored.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alexander
|
|
|
|
| Re: nginx, inside openvz CT, worker_cpu_affinity [message #47355 is a reply to message #47344] |
Tue, 31 July 2012 15:32 |
Vladimir Davydov
Messages: 5
Registered: July 2012
|
Junior Member |
|
|
On 07/31/2012 07:14 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:52:56PM +0400, Andrey Vagin wrote:
>> Here is an answer from Vladimir Davydov, who maintains scheduler in
>> vzkernel.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:29:43AM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
>>> http://nginx.org/en/docs/ngx_core_module.html#worker_cpu_aff inity
>>> >
>>> > worker_processes 4;
>>> > worker_cpu_affinity 0001 0010 0100 1000;
>>> >
>>> > "Binds worker processes to the sets of CPUs."
>>>> Does it make sense inside OpenVZ container?
>>> It never works. CPU affinity masks are ignored inside containers.
> I don't know about nginx in particular, but CPU affinity masks certainly
> work for me in OpenVZ containers, at least on RHEL5'ish kernels. I've
> just re-tested on this one:
>
> $ uname -mrs
> Linux 2.6.18-308.4.1.el5.028stab100.2.owl1 x86_64
>
> Specifically, sched_setaffinity() in custom code (custom patch to Apache's
> suEXEC) and libgomp's GOMP_CPU_AFFINITY env var both work just fine.
>
> Vladimir - does your comment apply to some other kernel versions?
> RHEL6'ish maybe? It'd be good to know and be prepared... and it'd be
> really unfortunate to lose this functionality when we finally move to
> RHEL6'ish kernels (soonish).
In RHEL5-based kernels we had the notion of virtual cpus: tasks were
scheduled on vcpus while the vcpus were somehow distributed among
physical cpus. The sched_setaffinity syscall could be used to bind tasks
to vcpus then.
This concept was cumbersome and often sub-optimal so in RHEL6 we decided
to drop it: currently setting nr_cpus limit for a container is actually
equivalent to setting cpulimit. The decision is justified by the fact
that the latest Linux scheduler is smart enough to gather actively
interacting tasks together so that there is no need to limit parallelism
artificially.
As a result, cpu affinity support was dropped. Tasks can still use the
sched_setaffinity syscall, but it will be ignored.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alexander
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Apr 18 03:23:42 GMT 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01544 seconds
|
OpenVZ Forum
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
