OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH 0/6] containers: Generic Process Containers (V6)
Re: [PATCH 0/6] containers: Generic Process Containers (V6) [message #9471 is a reply to message #9446] Fri, 05 January 2007 00:25 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Paul Menage is currently offline  Paul Menage
Messages: 642
Registered: September 2006
Senior Member
Hi Serge,

On 1/3/07, Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> From: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
> Subject: [RFC] [PATCH 1/1] container: define a namespace container subsystem
>
> Here's a stab at a namespace container subsystem based on
> Paul Menage's containers patch, just to experiment with
> how semantics suit what we want.

Thanks for looking at this.

What you have here is the basic boilerplate for any generic container
subsystem. I realise that my current containers patch has some
incompatibilities with the way that nsproxy wants to work.

>
> A few things we'll want to address:
>
> 1. We'll want to be able to hook things like
> rmdir, so that we can rm -rf /containers/vserver1
> to kill all processes in that container and all
> child containers.

The current model is that rmdir fails if there are any processes still
in the container; so you'd have to kill processes by looking for pids
in the "tasks" info file. This was behaviour inherited from the
cpusets code; I'd be open to making this more configurable (e.g.
specifying that rmdir should try to kill any remaining tasks).

>
> 2. We need a semantic difference between attaching
> to a container, and being the first to join the
> container you just created.

Right - the way to do this would probably be some kind of
"container_clone()" function that duplicates the properties of the
current container in a child, and immediately moves the current
process into that container.

>
> 3. We will want to be able to give the container
> attach function more info, so that we can ask to
> attach to just the network namespace, but none of
> the others, in the container we're attaching to.

If you want to be able to attach to different namespaces separately,
then possibly they should be separate container subsystems?

Paul
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [patch 00/12] net namespace : L3 namespace - introduction
Next Topic: [PATCH 2/2] Explicitly set pgid/sid of init
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Sep 30 02:21:49 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03581 seconds