OpenVZ Forum: Support » running dnstop in vm doesn't work -> unsupported data link type 113

Home » General » Support » running dnstop in vm doesn't work -> unsupported data link type 113

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: running dnstop in vm doesn't work -> unsupported data link type 113 [message #8280 is a reply to message #8235]

Mon, 13 November 2006 14:25

Alexandr Andreev
Messages: 35
Registered: October 2006

Member

Generally you can't use dnstop with venet0, because venet0 is a special interface and dnstop knows nothing about it.

You can use virtual ethernet device (veth) instead (http://wiki.openvz.org/Veth)

But if it's critical for you to use venet, we can make a patch for dnstop (or maybe for libpcap) and you will be able to use dnstop with venet.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		running dnstop in vm doesn't work -> unsupported data link type 113 By: rema on Wed, 08 November 2006 17:38
		Re: running dnstop in vm doesn't work -> unsupported data link type 113 By: dev on Fri, 10 November 2006 16:47
		Re: running dnstop in vm doesn't work -> unsupported data link type 113 By: rema on Fri, 10 November 2006 18:41
		Re: running dnstop in vm doesn't work -> unsupported data link type 113 By: dev on Fri, 10 November 2006 19:58
		Re: running dnstop in vm doesn't work -> unsupported data link type 113 By: Alexandr Andreev on Mon, 13 November 2006 14:25
		Re: running dnstop in vm doesn't work -> unsupported data link type 113 By: Alexandr Andreev on Mon, 13 November 2006 15:50
		Re: running dnstop in vm doesn't work -> unsupported data link type 113 By: rema on Mon, 13 November 2006 20:43
		Re: running dnstop in vm doesn't work -> unsupported data link type 113 By: aseques on Fri, 24 April 2009 08:33

Previous Topic:	SOLVED e1000e device eth0 does not seem to be found
Next Topic:	ssh prblem with virtual

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Sep 09 11:37:04 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04378 seconds