| Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices [message #8013 is a reply to message #7989] |
Fri, 03 November 2006 01:29  |
David Rientjes
Messages: 59
Registered: November 2006
|
Member |
|
|
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> So if we're going to have different groupings for different
> resources what's the use of "container" grouping all "controllers"
> together? I see this situation like each task_struct carries
> pointers to kmemsize controller, pivate pages controller,
> physical pages controller, CPU time controller, disk bandwidth
> controller, etc. Right? Or did I miss something?
My understanding is that the only addition to the task_struct is a pointer
to the struct container it belongs to. Then, the various controllers can
register the control files through the fs-based container interface and
all the manipulation can be done at that level. Having each task_struct
containing pointers to individual resource nodes was never proposed.
David
|
|
|
|
OpenVZ Forum
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
