OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices
Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices [message #7959 is a reply to message #7918] Tue, 31 October 2006 16:33 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Chris Friesen is currently offline  Chris Friesen
Messages: 4
Registered: August 2006
Junior Member
Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> Paul Jackson wrote:

> I agree, but you've cut some importaint questions away,
> so I ask them again:
>
> > What if if user creates a controller (configfs directory)
> > and doesn't remove it at all. Should controller stay in
> > memory even if nobody uses it?
>
> This is importaint to solve now - wether we want or not to
> keep "empty" beancounters in memory. If we do not then configfs
> usage is not acceptible.

I can certainly see scenarios where we would want to keep "empty"
beancounters around.

For instance, I move all the tasks out of a group but still want to be
able to obtain stats on how much cpu time the group has used.

Maybe we can do that without persisting the actual beancounters...I'm
not familiar enough with the code to say.

Chris
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices
Next Topic: microcode_ctl-1.15.tar.gz incorporates broken microcode?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Oct 28 20:28:30 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05604 seconds