Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices [message #7958 is a reply to message #7955] |
Tue, 31 October 2006 16:57   |
Srivatsa Vaddagiri
Messages: 241 Registered: August 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:34:52AM -0800, Paul Menage wrote:
> How about the cpusets approach, where once a cpuset has no children
> and no processes, a usermode helper can be executed - this could
> immediately remove the container/bean-counter if that's what the user
> wants. My generic containers patch copies this from cpusets.
Bingo. We crossed mails!
Kirill/Pavel,
As I mentioned in the begining of this thread, one of the
objective of this RFC is to seek consensus on what could be a good
compromise for the infrastructure in going forward. Paul Menage's
patches, being rework of existing code, is attactive to maintainers like
Andew.
>From that perspective, how well do you think the container
infrastructure patches meet your needs?
--
Regards,
vatsa
|
|
|