OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices
Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices [message #7926 is a reply to message #7908] Mon, 30 October 2006 18:01 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Paul Menage is currently offline  Paul Menage
Messages: 642
Registered: September 2006
Senior Member
On 10/30/06, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org> wrote:
> > Debated:
> > - syscall vs configfs interface
>
> 1. One of the major configfs ideas is that lifetime of
> the objects is completely driven by userspace.
> Resource controller shouldn't live as long as user
> want. It "may", but not "must"! As you have seen from
> our (beancounters) patches beancounters disapeared
> as soon as the last reference was dropped.

Why is this an important feature for beancounters? All the other
resource control approaches seem to prefer having userspace handle
removing empty/dead groups/containers.

> 2. Having configfs as the only interface doesn't alow
> people having resource controll facility w/o configfs.
> Resource controller must not depend on any "feature".

Why is depending on a feature like configfs worse than depending on a
feature of being able to extend the system call interface?

> > - Interaction of resource controllers, containers and cpusets
> > - Should we support, for instance, creation of resource
> > groups/containers under a cpuset?
> > - Should we have different groupings for different resources?
>
> This breaks the idea of groups isolation.

That's fine - some people don't want total isolation. If we're looking
for a solution that fits all the different requirements, then we need
that flexibility. I agree that the default would probably want to be
that the groupings be the same for all resource controllers /
subsystems.

Paul

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices
Next Topic: microcode_ctl-1.15.tar.gz incorporates broken microcode?
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Jul 20 16:50:54 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.07614 seconds
Powered by FUDforum Powered by Virtuozzo Containers