Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction [message #6749 is a reply to message #6665] |
Thu, 21 September 2006 01:52  |
Paul Menage
Messages: 642 Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 9/20/06, Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Interesting. So you could set up the fake node with "guarantee" and let
> it grow till "limit" ?
Sure - that works great. (Theoretically you could do this all in
userspace - start by assigning "guarantee" nodes to a
container/cpuset and when it gets close to its memory limit assign
more nodes to it. But in practice userspace can't keep up with rapid
memory allocators.
>
> BTW, can you do these with fake nodes:
> - dynamic creation
> - dynamic removal
> - dynamic change of size
The current fake numa support requires you to choose your node layout
at boot time - I've been working with 64 fake nodes of 128M each,
which gives a reasonable granularity for dividing a machine between
multiple different sized jobs.
>
> Also, How could we account when a process moves from one node to
> another ?
If you want to do that (the systems I'm working on don't really) you
could probably do it with the migrate_pages() syscall. It might not be
that efficient though.
Paul
|
|
|