Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction [message #6744 is a reply to message #6643] |
Wed, 20 September 2006 23:53  |
Paul Menage
Messages: 642 Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 9/20/06, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> The way you "associate" a file with a cpuset is to have some task in
> that cpuset open that file and touch its pages -- where that task does
> so before any other would be user of the file.
An alternative would be a way of binding files (or directory
hierarchies) to a particular set of memory nodes. Then you wouldn't
need to pre-fault the data. Extended attributes might be one way of
doing it.
>
> Such pre-touching of files is common occurrence on the HPC (High Perf
> Comp.) apps that run on the big honkin NUMA iron where cpusets were
> born. I'm guessing that someone hosting 5000 web servers would rather
> not deal with that particular hastle.
I'm looking at it from the perspective of job control systems that
need to have a good idea what big datasets the jobs running under them
are touching/sharing.
Paul
|
|
|