On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 10:52 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Rohit Seth wrote:
>
> > Right now the memory handler in this container subsystem is written in
> > such a way that when existing kernel reclaimer kicks in, it will first
> > operate on those (container with pages over the limit) pages first. But
> > in general I like the notion of containerizing the whole reclaim code.
>
> Which comes naturally with cpusets.
How are shared mappings dealt with, are pages charged to the set that
first faults them in?
OpenVZ Forum
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
