OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [RFC] network namespaces
Re: [PATCH 4/9] network namespaces: socket hashes [message #6696 is a reply to message #6577] Thu, 21 September 2006 12:34 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Daniel Lezcano is currently offline  Daniel Lezcano
Messages: 417
Registered: June 2006
Senior Member
Andrey Savochkin wrote:

> The main reason is that socket hash tables should be large enough to work
> efficiently, but it isn't good to waste a lot of memory for each namespace.
> Namespaces should be cheap enough, to allow to have hundreds of them.
> This reason of memory efficiency, of course, has a priority unless/until
> socket hash tables start to resize automatically.
>
> Another point is that routing lookup is much more complicated than the
> socket's one to add another search key.
> Routing also have additional routines for deleting entries matching some
> patterns, and so on.
> In short, routing is much more complicated, and it already quite efficient
> for various sizes of routing tables.

That makes sense, thx for the explanation.

Cheers.
-- Daniel.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH 2.6.18] ext2: errors behaviour fix
Next Topic: 64bit DMA in i2o_block
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Sep 08 23:41:06 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.07073 seconds