> > How does the containers implementation under discussion behave if a
> > process is part of a container and the container is removed?
> It first removes all the tasks belonging to this container (which means
> resetting the container pointers in task_struct and then per page
> container pointer belonging to anonymous pages). It then clears the
> container pointers in the mapping structure and also in the pages
> belonging to these files.
So the application continues to run unharmed?
Could we equip containers with restrictions on processors and nodes for
NUMA?