On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 20:27 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Yes, I read that in your patches, I was wondering how the cpuset
> approach would handle this.
>
> Neither are really satisfactory for shared mappings.
>
In which way? We could have the per container flag indicating whether
to charge this container for shared mapping that it initiates or to the
container where mapping belongs...or is there something different that
you are referring.