OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction [message #6604 is a reply to message #6599] Wed, 20 September 2006 18:07 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Rohit Seth is currently offline  Rohit Seth
Messages: 101
Registered: August 2006
Senior Member
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 10:38 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Rohit Seth wrote:
>
> > cpusets provides cpu and memory NODES binding to tasks. And I think it
> > works great for NUMA machines where you have different nodes with its
> > own set of CPUs and memory. The number of those nodes on a commodity HW
> > is still 1. And they can have 8-16 CPUs and in access of 100G of
> > memory. You may start using fake nodes (untested territory) to
>
> See linux-mm. We just went through a series of tests and functionality
> wise it worked just fine.
>

I thought the fake NUMA support still does not work on x86_64 baseline
kernel. Though Paul and Andrew have patches to make it work.

> > translate a single node machine into N different nodes. But am not sure
> > if this number of nodes can change dynamically on the running machine or
> > a reboot is required to change the number of nodes.
>
> This is commonly discussed under the subject of memory hotplug.
>

So now we depend on getting memory hot-plug to work for faking up these
nodes ...for the memory that is already present in the system. It just
does not sound logical.

> > Though when you want to have in access of 100 containers then the cpuset
> > function starts popping up on the oprofile chart very aggressively. And
> > this is the cost that shouldn't have to be paid (particularly) for a
> > single node machine.
>
> Yes this is a new way of using cpusets but it works and we could fix the
> scalability issues rather than adding new subsystems.
>

I think when you have 100's of zones then cost of allocating a page will
include checking cpuset validation and different zone list traversals
and checks...unless there is major surgery.

> > And what happens when you want to have cpuset with memory that needs to
> > be even further fine grained than each node.
>
> New node?
>

Am not clear how is this possible. Could you or Paul please explain.

> > Containers also provide a mechanism to move files to containers. Any
> > further references to this file come from the same container rather than
> > the container which is bringing in a new page.
>
> Hmmmm... Thats is interesting.
>
> > In future there will be more handlers like CPU and disk that can be
> > easily embeded into this container infrastructure.
>
> I think we should have one container mechanism instead of multiple. Maybe
> merge the two? The cpuset functionality is well established and working
> right.
>

I agree that we will need one container subsystem in the long run.
Something that can easily adapt to different configurations.

-rohit

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Re: namespace and nsproxy syscalls
Next Topic: [Lxc-devel] [patch 093/203] pidspace: is_init()
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Mon Nov 03 12:26:13 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.15498 seconds
Powered by FUDforum Powered by Virtuozzo Containers