OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [RFC] network namespaces
Re: Re: [RFC] network namespaces [message #6156 is a reply to message #6148] Sun, 10 September 2006 19:22 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Herbert Poetzl is currently offline  Herbert Poetzl
Messages: 239
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 11:45:35AM +0400, Dmitry Mishin wrote:
> On Sunday 10 September 2006 06:47, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > well, I think it would be best to have both, as
> > they are complementary to some degree, and IMHO
> > both, the full virtualization _and_ the isolation
> > will require a separate namespace to work,
> [snip]
> > I do not think that folks would want to recompile
> > their kernel just to get a light-weight guest or
> > a fully virtualized one

> In this case light-weight guest will have unnecessary overhead. For
> example, instead of using static pointer, we have to find the required
> common namespace before.

this is only required at 'bind' time, which makes
a non measurable fraction of the actual connection
usage (unless you keep binding ports over and over
without ever using them)

> And there will be no advantages for such guest over full-featured.

the advantage is in the flexibility, simplicity of
setup and the basically non-existant overhead on
the hot (conenction/transfer) part ...

> > best,
> > Herbert
> >
> > > --
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dmitry.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Dmitry.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH 2.6.18] ext2: errors behaviour fix
Next Topic: 64bit DMA in i2o_block
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Sep 08 23:30:40 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.07610 seconds