OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [RFC] network namespaces
Re: Re: [RFC] network namespaces [message #6148 is a reply to message #6147] Sun, 10 September 2006 07:45 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Mishin Dmitry is currently offline  Mishin Dmitry
Messages: 112
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
On Sunday 10 September 2006 06:47, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> well, I think it would be best to have both, as
> they are complementary to some degree, and IMHO
> both, the full virtualization _and_ the isolation
> will require a separate namespace to work,
[snip]
> I do not think that folks would want to recompile
> their kernel just to get a light-weight guest or
> a fully virtualized one
In this case light-weight guest will have unnecessary overhead.
For example, instead of using static pointer, we have to find the required
common namespace before. And there will be no advantages for such guest over
full-featured.

>
> best,
> Herbert
>
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Dmitry.

--
Thanks,
Dmitry.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH 2.6.18] ext2: errors behaviour fix
Next Topic: 64bit DMA in i2o_block
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Jul 15 03:29:39 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03358 seconds