OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [RFC] network namespaces
Re: [RFC] network namespaces [message #5978 is a reply to message #5941] Wed, 06 September 2006 09:10 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Daniel Lezcano is currently offline  Daniel Lezcano
Messages: 417
Registered: June 2006
Senior Member
Hi Herbert,

> well, the 'ip subset' approach Linux-VServer and
> other Jail solutions use is very clean, it just does
> not match your expectations of a virtual interface
> (as there is none) and it does not cope well with
> all kinds of per context 'requirements', which IMHO
> do not really exist on the application layer (only
> on the whole system layer)
>
> IMHO that would be quite simple, have a 'namespace'
> for limiting port binds to a subset of the available
> ips and another one which does complete network
> virtualization with all the whistles and bells, IMHO
> most of them are orthogonal and can easily be combined
>
> - full network virtualization
> - lightweight ip subset
> - both
>
> IMHO this requirement only arises from the full system
> virtualization approach, just look at the other jail
> solutions (solaris, bsd, ...) some of them do not even
> allow for more than a single ip but they work quite
> well when used properly ...

As far as I see, vserver use a layer 3 solution but, when needed, the
veth "component", made by Nestor Pena, is used to provide a layer 2
virtualization. Right ?

Having the two solutions, you have certainly a lot if information about
use cases. From the point of view of vserver, can you give some examples
of when a layer 3 solution is better/worst than a layer 2 solution ? Who
wants a layer 2/3 virtualization and why ?

These informations will be very useful.

Regards

-- Daniel
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH 2.6.18] ext2: errors behaviour fix
Next Topic: 64bit DMA in i2o_block
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Oct 18 19:46:26 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08924 seconds