OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 2/7] UBC: core (structures, API)
Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 2/7] UBC: core (structures, API) [message #5525 is a reply to message #5524] Tue, 22 August 2006 12:46 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
dev is currently offline  dev
Messages: 1693
Registered: September 2005
Location: Moscow
Senior Member
Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 03:02:17PM +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
>
>>>Except that you eventually have to lock ub0. Seems that the cache line
>>>for that spinlock could bounce quite a bit in such a hot path.
>>
>>do you mean by ub0 host system ub which we call ub0
>>or you mean a top ub?
>
>
> If this were used for pure resource management purpose (w/o containers)
> then the top ub would be ub0 right? "How bad would the contention on the
> ub0->lock be then" is I guess Matt's question.
Probably we still misunderstand here each other.
top ub can be any UB. it's children do account resources
to the whole chain of UBs to the top parent.

i.e. ub0 is not a tree root.

Kirill

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 4/7] UBC: syscalls (user interface)
Next Topic: [Lxc-devel] end of list
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Apr 10 20:18:24 GMT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.99540 seconds
Powered by FUDforum Powered by Virtuozzo Containers