OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core) [message #5483 is a reply to message #5414] Mon, 21 August 2006 11:27 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
dev is currently offline  dev
Messages: 1693
Registered: September 2005
Location: Moscow
Senior Member
>>in case of anon_vma, page->mapping can be the same
>>for 2 pages beloning to different containers.
>>
>
>
> In your experience, have you seen processes belonging to different
> containers sharing the same anon_vma? On a more general note, could you
> please point me to a place that has the list of requirements for which
> we are designing this solution.
>
>
>>>>nor is it ambiguous in any way. It is very strict,
>>>>and very straightforward.
>>>
>>>What additional ambiguity you have when inode or task structures have
>>>the required information.
>>
>>inodes can belong to multiple containers and so do the pages.
>>
>
>
> I'm still thinking that inodes should belong to one container (or may be
> have it configurable based on some flag).
this is not true for OpenVZ nor Linux-VServer.

Thanks,
Kirill

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH] UBC: user resource beancounters
Next Topic: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 4/7] UBC: syscalls (user interface)
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Apr 10 13:47:38 GMT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.75452 seconds
Powered by FUDforum Powered by Virtuozzo Containers