OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 4/7] UBC: syscalls (user interface)
Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 4/7] UBC: syscalls (user interface) [message #5436 is a reply to message #5423] Fri, 18 August 2006 19:16 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Chris Friesen is currently offline  Chris Friesen
Messages: 4
Registered: August 2006
Junior Member
Paul Jackson wrote:

> The fair sharing model (such as in CKRM) that strives for maximum
> utilization of resources respecting priorities and min/max limits is
> (I suppose) quite useful for certain workloads and customers.
>
> The hardwall NUMA placement model (such as in cpusets) that strives
> for maximum processor and memory isolation between jobs, preferring
> to leave allocated resources unused rather than trying to share them,
> is also quite useful for some. Customers with 256 thread, one or
> two day long run time, -very- tightly coupled huge OpenMP Fortran
> jobs that need to complete within a few percent of the same time,
> every runtime, demand it.

Hypothetically, if you can guarantee that those threads get a specified
amount of time, but may possibly get *more* cpu time and thus finish
faster, what's the problem?

Chris
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH] e1000: ring buffers resources cleanup
Next Topic: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 4/7] UBC: syscalls (user interface)
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Aug 27 21:06:46 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.12592 seconds