OpenVZ Forum: Support » using virsh instead of prlctl

Home » General » Support » using virsh instead of prlctl

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: using virsh instead of prlctl [message #53764 is a reply to message #53762]

Wed, 10 November 2021 01:44

wsap
Messages: 70
Registered: March 2018
Location: Halifax, NS

Member

It looks to me like Virtuozzo is planning on abandoning their original goal of replacing vzctl with prlctl for *everything* and instead will be supporting:

- virsh for VMs
- vzctl for CTs

So basically just stick with vzctl for containers and all should be well. Seems like a good option to me anyway as few panels and providers actually made the switch from vzctl to prlctl for containers and this will help clearly define the line between VMs and containers nicely. It will very likely even make it easier for control panels to implement VMs and CTs on the same node.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		using virsh instead of prlctl By: freakout on Fri, 29 October 2021 14:31
		Re: using virsh instead of prlctl By: devnull on Sun, 31 October 2021 00:00
		Re: using virsh instead of prlctl By: wsap on Wed, 10 November 2021 01:44

Previous Topic:	OpenVZ 8 / virtuozzo linux 8
Next Topic:	Failed to get VM config

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Jul 14 02:32:10 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02117 seconds