Re: Is ploop stable/Any progress on quotas for simfs [message #53595 is a reply to message #53594] |
Mon, 18 November 2019 14:05 |
wsap
Messages: 70 Registered: March 2018 Location: Halifax, NS
|
Member |
|
|
ccto wrote on Sun, 17 November 2019 22:301. You may mount the ploop snapshot to some mountpount (e.g.) /mnt, and make the incremental file-based backup of that mountpoint. Then, you can restore it file by file.
Indeed! That's what we do. Just pointing out that it's more involved than SIMFS
ccto wrote on Sun, 17 November 2019 22:30Comparing to other, like KVM qcow2, there are also some storage overhead too.
For sure, but this is a comparison with SIMFS -- just making it clear what kinds of differences can be expected. I think the benefits outweigh the downsides, but that might not be the case for everyone.
ccto wrote on Sun, 17 November 2019 22:30From my personal experience, if you have a number of containers, each container contains a number of files, ploop performs faster than simfs over time.
That may be the case; I haven't done a direct comparison on the same hardware to know for sure. One thing we can be sure of is that it's definitely more performant migrating ploop containers as it doesn't need to xfer file by file.
|
|
|