Re: Is it the same product between OpenVZ 7, and Virtuozzo Linux 7? [message #53119 is a reply to message #53079] |
Fri, 12 January 2018 08:33  |
khorenko
Messages: 533 Registered: January 2006 Location: Moscow, Russia
|
Senior Member |
|
|
> The OpenVZ7 packages that are available are outdated, based on the old RHEL7.0 packages (and probably will remain there forever), while the Virtuozzo7 based on the RHEL7.4 packages.
https://download.openvz.org/virtuozzo/releases/
Just use OpenVZ builds and you won't have to deal with EULA.
i believe EULA is developed by lawyers to prevent people from installing 1000 nodes with Virtuozzo and paying for a single license, for example (you know, any license code can be cheated).
Honestly i don't understand being so toxic...
We do not force anybody to use any product. If you find or develop better solution - that's great, why not?
We do work for money, sorry for that. And we are quite small comparing to RedHat/Google, etc and sorry, nobody pays for free of charge products.
That's why our top priority product is Virtuozzo - yes, payed version. Now it's Virtuozzo 7.
At the same time we do release OpenVZ builds - they are built exactly from same sources as Virtuozzo builds, thus in particular they cannot have a different base like RHEL7.0 and RHEL7.4 as it's written above.
Yes, Virtuozzo 7 has advantages on features - ReadyKernel (very-very cool, we provide a lot of fixes via it, not only security), pfcache, Virtuozzo Storage, backups.
On the other hand OpenVZ 7 uses get testing from our company for free, and believe me, that's important.
You want fast untested updates? No problem, use https://download.openvz.org/virtuozzo/factory/
Otherwise we prepare an update, test it in Virtuozzo product and release the update - both for Virtuozzo and OpenVZ.
And have a nice day.
If your problem is solved - please, report it!
It's even more important than reporting the problem itself...
|
|
|