Glauber Costa Messages: 916 Registered: October 2011
Senior Member
On 10/23/2012 09:25 PM, JoonSoo Kim wrote:
> Hi, Glauber.
>
> 2012/10/19 Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>:
>> For the kmem slab controller, we need to record some extra
>> information in the kmem_cache structure.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
>> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
>> CC: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
>> CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
>> CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
>> CC: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> include/linux/slab.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/slab_def.h | 3 +++
>> include/linux/slub_def.h | 3 +++
>> mm/slab.h | 13 +++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
>> index 0dd2dfa..e4ea48a 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
>> @@ -177,6 +177,31 @@ unsigned int kmem_cache_size(struct kmem_cache *);
>> #define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN __alignof__(unsigned long long)
>> #endif
>>
>> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>
> Why workqueue.h is includede at this time?
> It may be future use, so is it better to add it later?
> Adding it at proper time makes git blame works better.
>
It is for later, I missed this.
OpenVZ Forum
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
