Michal Hocko Messages: 109 Registered: December 2011
Senior Member
On Mon 01-10-12 16:29:11, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 10/01/2012 04:15 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Based on the previous discussions I guess this one will get reworked,
> > right?
> >
>
> Yes, but most of it stayed. The hierarchy part is gone, but because we
> will still have kmem pages floating around (potentially), I am still
> using the mark_dead() trick with the corresponding get when kmem_accounted.
Is it OK if I hold on with the review of this one until the next
version?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs