OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH v3 00/13] kmem controller for memcg.
Re: [PATCH v3 10/13] memcg: use static branches when code not in use [message #48168 is a reply to message #47891] Mon, 01 October 2012 12:25 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Michal Hocko is currently offline  Michal Hocko
Messages: 109
Registered: December 2011
Senior Member
On Tue 18-09-12 18:04:07, Glauber Costa wrote:
[...]
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 4 +++-
> mm/memcontrol.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 82ede9a..4ec9fd5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include <linux/cgroup.h>
> #include <linux/vm_event_item.h>
> #include <linux/hardirq.h>
> +#include <linux/jump_label.h>
>
> struct mem_cgroup;
> struct page_cgroup;
> @@ -401,9 +402,10 @@ struct sock;
> void sock_update_memcg(struct sock *sk);
> void sock_release_memcg(struct sock *sk);
>
> +extern struct static_key memcg_kmem_enabled_key;
> static inline bool memcg_kmem_enabled(void)
> {
> - return true;
> + return static_key_false(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
> }
>
> extern bool __memcg_kmem_newpage_charge(gfp_t gfp, struct mem_cgroup **memcg,
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 720e4bb..aada601 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -467,6 +467,8 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_css(struct cgroup_subsys_state *s)
> #include <net/sock.h>
> #include <net/ip.h>
>
> +struct static_key memcg_kmem_enabled_key;
> +
> static bool mem_cgroup_is_root(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
> static int memcg_charge_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp, u64 size);
> static void memcg_uncharge_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, u64 size);
> @@ -624,6 +626,16 @@ void __memcg_kmem_uncharge_page(struct page *page, int order)
> WARN_ON(mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg));
> memcg_uncharge_kmem(memcg, PAGE_SIZE << order);
> }
> +
> +static void disarm_kmem_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> + if (memcg_kmem_is_accounted(memcg))
> + static_key_slow_dec(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
> +}
> +#else
> +static void disarm_kmem_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM */
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_INET) && defined(CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM)
> @@ -639,6 +651,12 @@ static void disarm_sock_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> }
> #endif
>
> +static void disarm_static_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> + disarm_sock_keys(memcg);
> + disarm_kmem_keys(memcg);
> +}
> +
> static void drain_all_stock_async(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
>
> static struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *
> @@ -4131,7 +4149,11 @@ static void memcg_update_kmem_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, u64 val)
> */
> mutex_lock(&set_limit_mutex);
> if ((val != RESOURCE_MAX) && memcg_kmem_set_active(memcg)) {
> -
> + /*
> + * Once the static branch is enabled it will only be
> + * disabled when the last reference to memcg is gone.
> + */
> + static_key_slow_inc(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);

I guess the reason why we do not need to inc also for children is that
we do not inherit kmem_accounted, right?

> mem_cgroup_get(memcg);
>
> for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(iter, memcg) {
> @@ -5066,7 +5088,7 @@ static void free_work(struct work_struct *work)
> * to move this code around, and make sure it is outside
> * the cgroup_lock.
> */
> - disarm_sock_keys(memcg);
> + disarm_static_keys(memcg);
> if (size < PAGE_SIZE)
> kfree(memcg);
> else
> --
> 1.7.11.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [RFC PATCH 0/5] net: socket bind to file descriptor introduced
Next Topic: [RFC] Posix timers improvements, requied for CRIU project
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Nov 19 04:17:46 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03020 seconds