OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH v3 04/13] kmem accounting basic infrastructure
Re: [PATCH v3 04/13] kmem accounting basic infrastructure [message #48074 is a reply to message #48073] Wed, 26 September 2012 20:16 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Tejun Heo is currently offline  Tejun Heo
Messages: 184
Registered: November 2006
Senior Member
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:02:14AM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> But think in terms of functionality: This thing here is a lot more
> similar to swap than use_hierarchy. Would you argue that memsw should be
> per-root ?

I'm fairly sure you can make about the same argument about
use_hierarchy. There is a choice to make here and one is simpler than
the other. I want the additional complexity justified by actual use
cases which isn't too much to ask for especially when the complexity
is something visible to userland.

So let's please stop arguing semantics. If this is definitely
necessary for some use cases, sure let's have it. If not, let's
consider it later. I'll stop responding on "inherent differences." I
don't think we'll get anywhere with that.

Michal, Johannes, Kamezawa, what are your thoughts?

Thanks.

--
tejun
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH v3 00/16] slab accounting for memcg
Next Topic: [RFC PATCH 0/5] net: socket bind to file descriptor introduced
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Aug 31 15:02:02 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.10763 seconds