> On 06/26/2012 03:17 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> + memcg_uncharge_kmem(memcg, size);
> >> >+ mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
> >> >+}
> >> >+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__mem_cgroup_free_kmem_page);
> >> > #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM */
> >> >
> >> > #if defined(CONFIG_INET) && defined(CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM)
> >> >@@ -5645,3 +5751,69 @@ static int __init enable_swap_account(char *s)
> >> > __setup("swapaccount=", enable_swap_account);
> >> >
> >> > #endif
> >> >+
> >> >+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM
> > gargh. CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM, please!
> >
>
> Here too. I like it as much as you do.
>
> But that is consistent with the rest of the file, and I'd rather have
> it this way.
There's not much point in being consistent with something which is so
unpleasant. I'm on a little campaign to rename
CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR to CONFIG_MEMCG, only nobody has taken my
bait yet. Be first!