OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH v4 00/25] kmem limitation for memcg
Re: [PATCH v4 05/25] memcg: Always free struct memcg through schedule_work() [message #46885 is a reply to message #46865] Thu, 21 June 2012 11:39 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki is currently offline  KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Messages: 463
Registered: September 2006
Senior Member
(2012/06/20 17:40), Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 06/20/2012 11:32 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>> >Maybe Pekka can merge the current -mm with his tree?
>> I first want to have a stable base from Christoph's "common slab" series
>> before I am comfortable with going forward with the memcg parts.
>>
>> Feel free to push forward any preparational patches to the slab
>> allocators, though.
>>
>> Pekka
>
> Kame and others:
>
> If you are already comfortable with the general shape of the series, it would do me good to do the same with the memcg preparation patches, so we have less code to review and merge in the next window.
>
> They are:
>
> memcg: Make it possible to use the stock for more than one page.
> memcg: Reclaim when more than one page needed.
> memcg: change defines to an enum
>
> Do you see any value in merging them now ?
>

I'll be okay with the 3 patches for memcg.

Thanks,
-Kame
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH] provide a common place for initcall processing in kmem_cache
Next Topic: [PATCH] SUNRPC: return negative value in case rpcbind client creation error
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Jul 04 05:02:34 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02415 seconds