OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH v3 00/28] kmem limitation for memcg
[PATCH v3 17/28] skip memcg kmem allocations in specified code regions [message #46536 is a reply to message #46517] Fri, 25 May 2012 13:03 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Glauber Costa is currently offline  Glauber Costa
Messages: 916
Registered: October 2011
Senior Member
This patch creates a mechanism that skip memcg allocations during
certain pieces of our core code. It basically works in the same way
as preempt_disable()/preempt_enable(): By marking a region under
which all allocations will be accounted to the root memcg.

We need this to prevent races in early cache creation, when we
allocate data using caches that are not necessarily created already.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
CC: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
CC: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
mm/memcontrol.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 81a173c..0761dda 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1613,6 +1613,7 @@ struct task_struct {
unsigned long nr_pages; /* uncharged usage */
unsigned long memsw_nr_pages; /* uncharged mem+swap usage */
} memcg_batch;
+ unsigned int memcg_kmem_skip_account;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
atomic_t ptrace_bp_refcnt;
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 44589fb..f3a3812 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -479,6 +479,21 @@ struct cg_proto *tcp_proto_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_proto_cgroup);
#endif /* CONFIG_INET */

+static void memcg_stop_kmem_account(void)
+{
+ if (!current->mm)
+ return;
+
+ current->memcg_kmem_skip_account++;
+}
+
+static void memcg_resume_kmem_account(void)
+{
+ if (!current->mm)
+ return;
+
+ current->memcg_kmem_skip_account--;
+}
char *mem_cgroup_cache_name(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct kmem_cache *cachep)
{
char *name;
@@ -540,7 +555,9 @@ static struct kmem_cache *memcg_create_kmem_cache(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
if (new_cachep)
goto out;

+ memcg_stop_kmem_account();
new_cachep = kmem_cache_dup(memcg, cachep);
+ memcg_resume_kmem_account();

if (new_cachep == NULL) {
new_cachep = cachep;
@@ -631,7 +648,9 @@ static void memcg_create_cache_enqueue(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
if (!css_tryget(&memcg->css))
return;

+ memcg_stop_kmem_account();
cw = kmalloc(sizeof(struct create_work), GFP_NOWAIT);
+ memcg_resume_kmem_account();
if (cw == NULL) {
css_put(&memcg->css);
return;
@@ -666,6 +685,9 @@ struct kmem_cache *__mem_cgroup_get_kmem_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
int idx;
struct task_struct *p;

+ if (!current->mm || current->memcg_kmem_skip_account)
+ return cachep;
+
gfp |= cachep->allocflags;

if (cachep->memcg_params.memcg)
@@ -700,6 +722,9 @@ bool __mem_cgroup_new_kmem_page(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp)
if (!current->mm || in_interrupt())
return true;

+ if (!current->mm || current->memcg_kmem_skip_account)
+ return true;
+
rcu_read_lock();
p = rcu_dereference(current->mm->owner);
memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(p);
--
1.7.7.6
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH] NFS: hard-code init_net for NFS callback transports
Next Topic: [PATCH v4 0/4] per cgroup cpu statistics
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Oct 11 22:24:09 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.07215 seconds