OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH v2 00/29] kmem limitation for memcg
[PATCH v2 29/29] Documentation: add documentation for slab tracker for memcg [message #46329 is a reply to message #46299] Fri, 11 May 2012 17:44 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Glauber Costa is currently offline  Glauber Costa
Messages: 916
Registered: October 2011
Senior Member
In a separate patch, to aid reviewers.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
CC: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
CC: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
CC: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
---
Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
index 4c95c00..9accaa1 100644
--- a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt
@@ -75,6 +75,12 @@ Brief summary of control files.
memory.kmem.tcp.limit_in_bytes # set/show hard limit for tcp buf memory
memory.kmem.tcp.usage_in_bytes # show current tcp buf memory allocation

+ memory.kmem.limit_in_bytes # set/show hard limit for general kmem memory
+ memory.kmem.usage_in_bytes # show current general kmem memory allocation
+ memory.kmem.failcnt # show current number of kmem limit hits
+ memory.kmem.max_usage_in_bytes # show max kmem usage
+ memory.kmem.slabinfo # show cgroup-specific slab usage information
+
1. History

The memory controller has a long history. A request for comments for the memory
@@ -271,6 +277,14 @@ cgroup may or may not be accounted.
Currently no soft limit is implemented for kernel memory. It is future work
to trigger slab reclaim when those limits are reached.

+Kernel memory is not accounted until it is limited. Users that want to just
+track kernel memory usage can set the limit value to a big enough value so
+the limit is guaranteed to never hit. A kernel memory limit bigger than the
+current memory limit will have this effect as well.
+
+This guarantes that this extension is backwards compatible to any previous
+memory cgroup version.
+
2.7.1 Current Kernel Memory resources accounted

* sockets memory pressure: some sockets protocols have memory pressure
@@ -279,6 +293,24 @@ per cgroup, instead of globally.

* tcp memory pressure: sockets memory pressure for the tcp protocol.

+* slab/kmalloc:
+
+When slab memory is tracked (memory.kmem.limit_in_bytes != -1ULL), both
+memory.kmem.usage_in_bytes and memory.usage_in_bytes are updated. When
+memory.kmem.limit_in_bytes is left alone, no tracking of slab caches takes
+place.
+
+Because a slab page is shared among many tasks, it is not possible to take
+any meaningful action upon task migration. Slabs created in a cgroup stay
+around until the cgroup is destructed. Information about the slabs used
+by the cgroup is displayed in the cgroup file memory.kmem.slabinfo. The format
+of this file is and should remain compatible with /proc/slabinfo.
+
+Upon cgroup destruction, slabs that holds no live references are destructed.
+Workers are fired to destroy the remaining caches as they objects are freed.
+
+Memory used by dead caches are shown in the proc file /proc/dead_slabinfo
+
3. User Interface

0. Configuration
@@ -287,6 +319,7 @@ a. Enable CONFIG_CGROUPS
b. Enable CONFIG_RESOURCE_COUNTERS
c. Enable CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
d. Enable CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP (to use swap extension)
+d. Enable CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM (to use experimental kmem extension)

1. Prepare the cgroups (see cgroups.txt, Why are cgroups needed?)
# mount -t tmpfs none /sys/fs/cgroup
--
1.7.7.6
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH RFC 00/13] Lockd: grace period containerization
Next Topic: [PATCH v5 0/2] fix static_key disabling problem in memcg
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Aug 18 02:18:31 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.21483 seconds