OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix problem with static_key decrement
[PATCH v2 4/5] don't take cgroup_mutex in destroy() [message #46035 is a reply to message #46031] Mon, 23 April 2012 19:37 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Glauber Costa is currently offline  Glauber Costa
Messages: 916
Registered: October 2011
Senior Member
Most of the destroy functions are only doing very simple things
like freeing memory.

The ones who goes through lists and such, already use its own
locking for those.

* The cgroup itself won't go away until we free it, (after destroy)
* The parent won't go away because we hold a reference count
* There are no more tasks in the cgroup, and the cgroup is declared
dead (cgroup_is_removed() == true)

[v2: don't cgroup_lock the freezer and blkcg ]

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
CC: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
CC: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
---
kernel/cgroup.c | 9 ++++-----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index 932c318..976d332 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -869,13 +869,13 @@ static void cgroup_diput(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode)
* agent */
synchronize_rcu();

- mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
/*
* Release the subsystem state objects.
*/
for_each_subsys(cgrp->root, ss)
ss->destroy(cgrp);

+ mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
cgrp->root->number_of_cgroups--;
mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);

@@ -3994,13 +3994,12 @@ static long cgroup_create(struct cgroup *parent, struct dentry *dentry,

err_destroy:

+ mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
for_each_subsys(root, ss) {
if (cgrp->subsys[ss->subsys_id])
ss->destroy(cgrp);
}

- mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
-
/* Release the reference count that we took on the superblock */
deactivate_super(sb);

@@ -4349,9 +4348,9 @@ int __init_or_module cgroup_load_subsys(struct cgroup_subsys *ss)
int ret = cgroup_init_idr(ss, css);
if (ret) {
dummytop->subsys[ss->subsys_id] = NULL;
+ mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
ss->destroy(dummytop);
subsys[i] = NULL;
- mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
return ret;
}
}
@@ -4447,10 +4446,10 @@ void cgroup_unload_subsys(struct cgroup_subsys *ss)
* pointer to find their state. note that this also takes care of
* freeing the css_id.
*/
+ mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
ss->destroy(dummytop);
dummytop->subsys[ss->subsys_id] = NULL;

- mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cgroup_unload_subsys);

--
1.7.7.6
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH 0/3] Fix problem with static_key decrement
Next Topic: [PATCH 1/6] LockD: pass service to per-net up and down functions
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Aug 04 13:15:03 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.56705 seconds