OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH 0/4] My contribution towards the end of populate()
Re: [PATCH 4/4] get rid of populate for memcg [message #45601 is a reply to message #45598] Wed, 21 March 2012 16:30 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Glauber Costa is currently offline  Glauber Costa
Messages: 916
Registered: October 2011
Senior Member
On 03/21/2012 08:06 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> I don't quite get why a protocol module would be loaded but not
> reigstered. Do we actually have cases like that? I know it's
> mechanically possible but don't think there's any actual use case or
> existing code which does that, so no need to worry about them.
>

Probably I'm just over worrying here. If your macro can handle
unregistering well, I think I should be fine using them.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH 1/4] don't trigger warning when d_subdirs is not empty.
Next Topic: [PATCH v2 0/2] remove sock memcg dependencies on populate
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Sep 10 19:35:04 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.11136 seconds