OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH 0/5] SUNRPC: make caches network namespace aware
Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUNRPC: make caches network namespace aware [message #44973 is a reply to message #44972] Thu, 19 January 2012 15:43 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Stanislav Kinsbursky is currently offline  Stanislav Kinsbursky
Messages: 683
Registered: October 2011
Senior Member
19.01.2012 19:34, Myklebust, Trond пишет:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stanislav Kinsbursky [mailto:skinsbursky@parallels.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 10:32 AM
>> To: Myklebust, Trond
>> Cc: Dr James Bruce Fields; linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org; Pavel Emelianov;
>> neilb@suse.de; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
>> James Bottomley; bfields@fieldses.org; davem@davemloft.net;
>> devel@openvz.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUNRPC: make caches network namespace aware
>>
>> 19.01.2012 19:19, Trond Myklebust пишет:
>>> On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 18:48 +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>>>> One more step towards to "NFS in container".
>>>> With this patch set caches are allocated per network namespace.
>>>>
>>>> The following series consists of:
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Stanislav Kinsbursky (5):
>>>> SUNRPC: cache creation and destruction routines introduced
>>>> SUNRPC: create unix gid cache per network namespace
>>>> SUNRPC: create GSS auth cache per network namespace
>>>> SUNRPC: ip map cache per network namespace cleanup
>>>> SUNRPC: generic cache register routines removed
>>>
>>> The patches look good, and I've applied them for now in my 'devel'
>>> branch so we can test them, but I'd like to get an Ack/Nack from Bruce
>>> before committing to merging them.
>>>
>>
>> Cool, thanks.
>> BTW, these patches depends on patch "NFSd: use network-namespace-
>> aware cache registering routines", which Bruce took already (and it's even in
>> linux-next already), but not in your devel tree for some reason.
>
> In that case, would it make more sense to carry them in Bruce's tree?
>

It's up to you, of course. But, frankly, I don't think so.
To be more precise, only the last patch ("SUNRPC: generic cache register
routines removed") depends on the patch, which is in linux-next already. IOW,
those patch removed NFSd dependence on cache_register() and cache_unregister()
routines and was commited to linux-next at Wed, 7 Dec 2011.


--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH] NFS: decode destination address in proper network namespace context
Next Topic: [PATCH] NFS: remove unused nfs4_find_client_no_ident function
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Aug 26 10:51:56 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.16910 seconds