OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH v5 00/10] per-cgroup tcp memory pressure
Re: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] per-cgroup tcp memory pressure [message #44131 is a reply to message #44130] Fri, 18 November 2011 19:51 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
davem is currently offline  davem
Messages: 463
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:39:03 -0200

> On 11/17/2011 07:35 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: James Bottomley<jbottomley@parallels.com>
>> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:27:12 +0000
>>
>>> Ping on this, please. We're blocked on this patch set until we can
>>> get
>>> an ack that the approach is acceptable to network people.
>>
>> __sk_mem_schedule is now more expensive, because instead of
>> short-circuiting
>> the majority of the function's logic when "allocated<=
>> prot->sysctl_mem[0]"
>> and immediately returning 1, the whole rest of the function is run.
>
> Not the whole rest of the function. Rather, just the other two
> tests. But that's the behavior we need since if your parent is on
> pressure, you should be as well. How do you feel if we'd also provide
> two versions for this:
> 1) non-cgroup, try to return 1 as fast as we can
> 2) cgroup, also check your parents.

Fair enough.

> How about we make the jump_label only used for sockets (which is basic
> what we have now, just need a clear name to indicate that), and then
> enable it not when the first non-root cgroup is created, but when the
> first one sets the limit to something different than unlimited?
>
> Of course to that point, we'd be accounting only to the root
> structures,
> but I guess this is not a big deal.

This sounds good for now.

>> TCP specific stuff in mm/memcontrol.c, at best that's not nice at all.
>
> How crucial is that?

It's a big deal. We've been working for years to yank protocol specific
things even out of net/core/*.c, it simply doesn't belong there.

I'd even be happier if you had to create a net/ipv4/tcp_memcg.c and
include/net/tcp_memcg.h

> Thing is that as far as I am concerned, all the
> memcg people
...

What the memcg people want is entirely their problem, especially if it
involves crapping up non-networking files with protocol specific junk.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Profitez d'un site internet professionnel
Next Topic: [PATCH 0/6] SUNRPC: make RPC clients use network-namespace-aware PipeFS routines
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Sep 05 11:28:05 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.11052 seconds