Re: IPv6 and OVZ part deux [message #41457 is a reply to message #41338] |
Tue, 25 January 2011 13:03 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/theme/ovz3/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to previous message](/theme/ovz3/images/down.png) |
lars.bailey
Messages: 38 Registered: April 2010
|
Member |
|
|
I tried the aliased interface solution,and found it wasn't needed
for my specific application,but thanks for the info.
For what its worth,I dumped the source-route bridge,as I prefer to
have the ability to provide other transit mechanisms.
Between Ethernet bridging vs. virtual Ethernet with IPv6,it has now
become moot.
Unless you need bridging for a specific application(auto-config),I simply go with IPv6 virtual Ethernet,as these types of containers,are now reachable from within other containers.(just like bridged containers)
I do like the idea of using multiple bridges(physically or virtually bound),to form bridge groups,and these have worked with no issues.
Since removing ProxyARP and ProxyNDP,for dual-homed bridges,I do not have the link-local breakdowns,I had before.
In hind-sight,this was always demonstrated in documentation on the
Net.
|
|
|