> Hi Eric,
>
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 10:51:26AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Andrey Savochkin <saw@swsoft.com> writes:
>>
>> > One possible option to resolve this question is to show 2 relatively short
>> > patches just introducing namespaces for sockets in 2 ways: with explicit
>> > function parameters and using implicit current context.
>> > Then people can compare them and vote.
>> > Do you think it's worth the effort?
>>
>> Given that we have two strong opinions in different directions I think it
>> is worth the effort to resolve this.
>
> Do you have time to extract necessary parts of your old patch?
> Or you aren't afraid of letting me draft an alternative version of socket
> namespaces basing on your code? :)
I'm not terribly afraid. I can always say you did it wrong. :)
I don't think I am going to have time today. But since this conversation
is slowing down and we are to getting into the technical details.
I will try and find some time.
OpenVZ Forum
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
