Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at> writes:
>
>
>>On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 05:52:52AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>>>Inside the containers I want all network devices named eth0!
>>
>>huh? even if there are two of them? also tun?
>>
>>I think you meant, you want to be able to have eth0 in
>>_more_ than one guest where eth0 in a guest can also
>>be/use/relate to eth1 on the host, right?
>
>
> Right I want to have an eth0 in each guest where eth0 is
> it's own network device and need have no relationship to
> eth0 on the host.
How does that help anything? Do you envision programs
that make special decisions on whether the interface is
called eth0 v/s eth151?