Home » Mailing lists » Devel » Container Test Campaign
Re: Container Test Campaign [message #3888 is a reply to message #3871] |
Thu, 22 June 2006 21:51   |
Cedric Le Goater
Messages: 443 Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi marc !
Marc E. Fiuczynski wrote:
> You mention that testing isolation properties is more of an extra than an
> immediate criteria. Based on our experience, this actually is a fairly
> important criteria. Without decent isolation (both from a namespace and
> resource perspective) it is rather difficult to support lots of concurrent
> users. As our paper states, we run anywhere from 30-90 vservers per machine
> (each machine usually with a 2GHz processor and 1GB of RAM).
is that a common setup for planet lab or a maximum ? how many vservers/
vcontext do you think we should try to reach ?
> We are interested in checkpoint/restart too, but have nothing to test /
> contribute. I've forwarded your message to Jason Nieh @ Columbia. He has a
> relatively long history of working in that area. I saw a demo of their
> checkpoint/restart/migration support last December (live video migrated
> between servers within a single IBM blade system).
we've worked a few years with a zap guy. I only wished they were bit more
open (source) about what they've been doing since crak.
> Their latest paper
> published at USENIX LISA also states that they can migrate from one linux
> kernel version to another. This enables "live" system upgrade, which IMHO
> is just as important as load balancing.
this feature is one the *major* features of mobile containers but it will
require specific kernel APIs to make it maintainable on the long term.
> Another area we are quite interested in is "network virtualization" (private
> route tables, ip tables, etc). We are aware that other container based
> systems (e.g., openvz) have support for this, but we (i.e., PlanetLab) are
> pretty much a vserver shop at the moment. We added our own support to
> safely share a single, public IPv4 address between multiple containers,
> while simultaneously support raw sockets etc. This is an absolute
> requirement for PlanetLab, and I'd argue (but not here) that it also is
> important for desktop usage scenarios that involve containers and want to
> avoid the use of NAT.
Did you contribute that feature to vserver ?
So you have different containers exposing the same IP address ? How do you
assign incoming packets to a container ?
thanks,
C.
|
|
|
 |
|
Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
RE: Container Test Campaign
By: mef on Wed, 21 June 2006 19:25
|
 |
|
Re: Container Test Campaign
By: serue on Thu, 22 June 2006 11:31
|
 |
|
Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
RE: Container Test Campaign
By: mef on Fri, 23 June 2006 07:40
|
 |
|
Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
RE: Container Test Campaign
By: mef on Mon, 26 June 2006 08:57
|
 |
|
RE: Container Test Campaign
By: mef on Wed, 21 June 2006 19:25
|
 |
|
RE: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
RE: Container Test Campaign
By: mef on Fri, 23 June 2006 07:40
|
 |
|
Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: Container Test Campaign
By: serue on Thu, 22 June 2006 11:33
|
 |
|
Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
By: dev on Tue, 04 July 2006 14:32
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
RE: Container Test Campaign
By: mef on Mon, 03 July 2006 18:23
|
 |
|
Re: Container Test Campaign
By: kir on Mon, 03 July 2006 08:14
|
 |
|
Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
By: kir on Tue, 04 July 2006 12:19
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
By: kir on Tue, 04 July 2006 14:52
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
By: kir on Tue, 04 July 2006 16:30
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
By: kir on Wed, 05 July 2006 08:34
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
By: dev on Wed, 05 July 2006 10:43
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
By: dev on Thu, 06 July 2006 10:44
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
By: dev on Mon, 10 July 2006 08:16
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
By: dev on Thu, 06 July 2006 11:30
|
 |
|
Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: Container Test Campaign
|
 |
|
Re: [Vserver] Re: Container Test Campaign
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Jul 07 00:47:26 GMT 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03053 seconds
|